From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:51:43 +0000 (-0300) Subject: perf trace: Add BPF handler for unaugmented syscalls X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5834da7f10917245d191032f76f132e62e57197c;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git perf trace: Add BPF handler for unaugmented syscalls Will be used to assign to syscalls that don't need augmentation, i.e. those with just integer args. All syscalls will be in a BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, and the bpf_tail_call() keyed by the syscall id will either find nothing in place, which means the syscall is being filtered, or a function that will either add things like filenames to the ring buffer, right after the raw syscall args, or be this unaugmented handler that will just return 1, meaning don't filter the original raw_syscalls:sys_{enter,exit} tracepoint. For now it is not really being used, this is just leg work to break the patch into smaller pieces. It introduces a trace__find_bpf_program_by_title() helper that in turn uses libbpf's bpf_object__find_program_by_title() on the BPF object with the __augmented_syscalls__ map. "title" is how libbpf calls the SEC() argument for functions, i.e. the ELF section that follows a convention to specify what BPF program (a function with this SEC() marking) should be connected to which tracepoint, kprobes, etc. In perf anything that is of the form SEC("sys:event_name") will be connected to that tracepoint by perf's BPF loader. In this case its something that will be bpf_tail_call()ed from either the "raw_syscalls:sys_enter" or "raw_syscall:sys_exit" tracepoints, so its named "!raw_syscalls:unaugmented" to convey that idea, i.e. its not going to be directly attached to a tracepoint, thus it starts with a "!". Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Luis Cláudio Gonçalves Cc: Namhyung Kim Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-meucpjx2u0slpkayx56lxqq6@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c index 9bd5ecd6a8dd..07df952a0d7f 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct trace { *sys_exit, *augmented; } events; + struct bpf_program *unaugmented_prog; } syscalls; struct { struct bpf_map *map; @@ -2733,6 +2734,14 @@ out_enomem: } #ifdef HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT +static struct bpf_program *trace__find_bpf_program_by_title(struct trace *trace, const char *name) +{ + if (trace->bpf_obj == NULL) + return NULL; + + return bpf_object__find_program_by_title(trace->bpf_obj, name); +} + static void trace__init_bpf_map_syscall_args(struct trace *trace, int id, struct bpf_map_syscall_entry *entry) { struct syscall *sc = trace__syscall_info(trace, NULL, id); @@ -2814,6 +2823,12 @@ static int trace__init_syscalls_bpf_map(struct trace *trace __maybe_unused) { return 0; } + +static struct bpf_program *trace__find_bpf_program_by_title(struct trace *trace __maybe_unused, + const char *name __maybe_unused) +{ + return NULL; +} #endif // HAVE_LIBBPF_SUPPORT static int trace__set_ev_qualifier_filter(struct trace *trace) @@ -3914,6 +3929,7 @@ int cmd_trace(int argc, const char **argv) trace__set_bpf_map_filtered_pids(&trace); trace__set_bpf_map_syscalls(&trace); + trace.syscalls.unaugmented_prog = trace__find_bpf_program_by_title(&trace, "!raw_syscalls:unaugmented"); } err = bpf__setup_stdout(trace.evlist); diff --git a/tools/perf/examples/bpf/augmented_raw_syscalls.c b/tools/perf/examples/bpf/augmented_raw_syscalls.c index 2f822bb51717..48a536b1be6d 100644 --- a/tools/perf/examples/bpf/augmented_raw_syscalls.c +++ b/tools/perf/examples/bpf/augmented_raw_syscalls.c @@ -88,6 +88,12 @@ unsigned int augmented_filename__read(struct augmented_filename *augmented_filen return len; } +SEC("!raw_syscalls:unaugmented") +int syscall_unaugmented(struct syscall_enter_args *args) +{ + return 1; +} + SEC("raw_syscalls:sys_enter") int sys_enter(struct syscall_enter_args *args) {