From: Jia-Ju Bai Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 08:48:49 +0000 (+0800) Subject: opp: cpu: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4a823c0be80fa996234ebb41c80d40458b1bec1e;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git opp: cpu: Replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_KERNEL in dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table After checking all possible call chains to dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table() here, my tool finds that this function is never called in atomic context, namely never in an interrupt handler or holding a spinlock. And dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table() calls dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(), which calls mutex_lock that can sleep. It indicates that atmtcp_v_send() can call functions which may sleep. Thus GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary, and it can be replaced with GFP_KERNEL. This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- diff --git a/drivers/opp/cpu.c b/drivers/opp/cpu.c index 2d87bc1adf38..0c0910709435 100644 --- a/drivers/opp/cpu.c +++ b/drivers/opp/cpu.c @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev, if (max_opps <= 0) return max_opps ? max_opps : -ENODATA; - freq_table = kcalloc((max_opps + 1), sizeof(*freq_table), GFP_ATOMIC); + freq_table = kcalloc((max_opps + 1), sizeof(*freq_table), GFP_KERNEL); if (!freq_table) return -ENOMEM;