From: Paul E. McKenney Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:00:48 +0000 (-0700) Subject: rcu: Adjust debugfs tracing for kthread-based quiescent-state forcing X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4605c0143c6d611b3076025ba3a7e04293c01d69;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git rcu: Adjust debugfs tracing for kthread-based quiescent-state forcing Moving quiescent-state forcing into a kthread dispenses with the need for the ->n_rp_need_fqs field, so this commit removes it. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett --- diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt index f6f15ce39903..672d19083252 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt +++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt @@ -333,23 +333,23 @@ o Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct The output of "cat rcu/rcu_pending" looks as follows: rcu_sched: - 0 np=255892 qsp=53936 rpq=85 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nf=6445 nn=146741 - 1 np=261224 qsp=54638 rpq=33 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nf=5912 nn=155792 - 2 np=237496 qsp=49664 rpq=23 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nf=1201 nn=136629 - 3 np=236249 qsp=48766 rpq=98 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nf=207 nn=137723 - 4 np=221310 qsp=46850 rpq=7 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nf=3529 nn=123110 - 5 np=237332 qsp=48449 rpq=9 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nf=201 nn=137456 - 6 np=219995 qsp=46718 rpq=12 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nf=4202 nn=120834 - 7 np=249893 qsp=49390 rpq=42 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nf=41 nn=144888 + 0 np=255892 qsp=53936 rpq=85 cbr=0 cng=14417 gpc=10033 gps=24320 nn=146741 + 1 np=261224 qsp=54638 rpq=33 cbr=0 cng=25723 gpc=16310 gps=2849 nn=155792 + 2 np=237496 qsp=49664 rpq=23 cbr=0 cng=2762 gpc=45478 gps=1762 nn=136629 + 3 np=236249 qsp=48766 rpq=98 cbr=0 cng=286 gpc=48049 gps=1218 nn=137723 + 4 np=221310 qsp=46850 rpq=7 cbr=0 cng=26 gpc=43161 gps=4634 nn=123110 + 5 np=237332 qsp=48449 rpq=9 cbr=0 cng=54 gpc=47920 gps=3252 nn=137456 + 6 np=219995 qsp=46718 rpq=12 cbr=0 cng=50 gpc=42098 gps=6093 nn=120834 + 7 np=249893 qsp=49390 rpq=42 cbr=0 cng=72 gpc=38400 gps=17102 nn=144888 rcu_bh: - 0 np=146741 qsp=1419 rpq=6 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nf=2 nn=145314 - 1 np=155792 qsp=12597 rpq=3 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nf=3 nn=143180 - 2 np=136629 qsp=18680 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nf=0 nn=117936 - 3 np=137723 qsp=2843 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nf=0 nn=134863 - 4 np=123110 qsp=12433 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nf=0 nn=110671 - 5 np=137456 qsp=4210 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nf=0 nn=133235 - 6 np=120834 qsp=9902 rpq=2 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nf=2 nn=110921 - 7 np=144888 qsp=26336 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nf=0 nn=118542 + 0 np=146741 qsp=1419 rpq=6 cbr=0 cng=6 gpc=0 gps=0 nn=145314 + 1 np=155792 qsp=12597 rpq=3 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=8 nn=143180 + 2 np=136629 qsp=18680 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=7 gps=6 nn=117936 + 3 np=137723 qsp=2843 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=10 gps=7 nn=134863 + 4 np=123110 qsp=12433 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=4 gps=2 nn=110671 + 5 np=137456 qsp=4210 rpq=1 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=5 nn=133235 + 6 np=120834 qsp=9902 rpq=2 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=6 gps=3 nn=110921 + 7 np=144888 qsp=26336 rpq=0 cbr=0 cng=0 gpc=8 gps=2 nn=118542 As always, this is once again split into "rcu_sched" and "rcu_bh" portions, with CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels having an additional @@ -377,17 +377,6 @@ o "gpc" is the number of times that an old grace period had o "gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started, but this CPU was not yet aware of it. -o "nf" is the number of times that this CPU suspected that the - current grace period had run for too long, and thus needed to - be forced. - - Please note that "forcing" consists of sending resched IPIs - to holdout CPUs. If that CPU really still is in an old RCU - read-side critical section, then we really do have to wait for it. - The assumption behing "forcing" is that the CPU is not still in - an old RCU read-side critical section, but has not yet responded - for some other reason. - o "nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing. Alert readers will note that the rcu "nn" number for a given CPU very closely matches the rcu_bh "np" number for that same CPU. This diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h index 2d04106d1533..7fb93cedc76a 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree.h +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h @@ -312,7 +312,6 @@ struct rcu_data { unsigned long n_rp_cpu_needs_gp; unsigned long n_rp_gp_completed; unsigned long n_rp_gp_started; - unsigned long n_rp_need_fqs; unsigned long n_rp_need_nothing; /* 6) _rcu_barrier() and OOM callbacks. */ diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c index abffb486e94e..f54f0ceda0cf 100644 --- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c +++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c @@ -386,10 +386,9 @@ static void print_one_rcu_pending(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp) rdp->n_rp_report_qs, rdp->n_rp_cb_ready, rdp->n_rp_cpu_needs_gp); - seq_printf(m, "gpc=%ld gps=%ld nf=%ld nn=%ld\n", + seq_printf(m, "gpc=%ld gps=%ld nn=%ld\n", rdp->n_rp_gp_completed, rdp->n_rp_gp_started, - rdp->n_rp_need_fqs, rdp->n_rp_need_nothing); }