From: Venkatesh Srinivas Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:36:26 +0000 (-0700) Subject: perf/x86/intel: Use rdmsrl_safe() when initializing RAPL PMU X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=24223657806a;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git perf/x86/intel: Use rdmsrl_safe() when initializing RAPL PMU CPUs which should support the RAPL counters according to Family/Model/Stepping may still issue #GP when attempting to access the RAPL MSRs. This may happen when Linux is running under KVM and we are passing-through host F/M/S data, for example. Use rdmsrl_safe to first access the RAPL_POWER_UNIT MSR; if this fails, do not attempt to use this PMU. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Srinivas Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1394739386-22260-1-git-send-email-venkateshs@google.com Cc: zheng.z.yan@intel.com Cc: eranian@google.com Cc: ak@linux.intel.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [ The patch also silently fixes another bug: rapl_pmu_init() didn't handle the memory alloc failure case previously. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c index 4b9a9e9466bd..7c87424d4140 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c @@ -535,6 +535,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu) struct rapl_pmu *pmu = per_cpu(rapl_pmu, cpu); int phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu); u64 ms; + u64 msr_rapl_power_unit_bits; if (pmu) return 0; @@ -542,6 +543,9 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu) if (phys_id < 0) return -1; + if (!rdmsrl_safe(MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT, &msr_rapl_power_unit_bits)) + return -1; + pmu = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu)); if (!pmu) return -1; @@ -555,8 +559,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu) * * we cache in local PMU instance */ - rdmsrl(MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT, pmu->hw_unit); - pmu->hw_unit = (pmu->hw_unit >> 8) & 0x1FULL; + pmu->hw_unit = (msr_rapl_power_unit_bits >> 8) & 0x1FULL; pmu->pmu = &rapl_pmu_class; /* @@ -677,7 +680,9 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) cpu_notifier_register_begin(); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { - rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu); + ret = rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu); + if (ret) + goto out; rapl_cpu_init(cpu); } @@ -700,6 +705,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void) hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask), ktime_to_ms(pmu->timer_interval)); +out: cpu_notifier_register_done(); return 0;