From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 22:33:48 +0000 (+0100) Subject: bpf: add further test cases around div/mod and others X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=21ccaf21497b72f42133182716a42dbf573d314b;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git bpf: add further test cases around div/mod and others Update selftests to relfect recent changes and add various new test cases. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index e3938e395cba..4cd9ea9b3449 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -2003,10 +2003,14 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { { { 4, 0 }, { 5, 10 } } }, { - "INT: DIV by zero", + /* This one doesn't go through verifier, but is just raw insn + * as opposed to cBPF tests from here. Thus div by 0 tests are + * done in test_verifier in BPF kselftests. + */ + "INT: DIV by -1", .u.insns_int = { BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R6, R1), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R7, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R7, -1), BPF_LD_ABS(BPF_B, 3), BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, R0, R7), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 9e7075b268be..697bd83de295 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -111,7 +112,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = 0, + .retval = 42, }, { "DIV32 by 0, zero check 2", @@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = 0, + .retval = 42, }, { "DIV64 by 0, zero check", @@ -135,7 +136,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = 0, + .retval = 42, }, { "MOD32 by 0, zero check 1", @@ -147,7 +148,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = 0, + .retval = 42, }, { "MOD32 by 0, zero check 2", @@ -159,7 +160,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, - .retval = 0, + .retval = 42, }, { "MOD64 by 0, zero check", @@ -171,13 +172,245 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 42, + }, + { + "DIV32 by 0, zero check ok, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 2), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 16), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 8, + }, + { + "DIV32 by 0, zero check 1, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV32 by 0, zero check 2, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV64 by 0, zero check, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "MOD32 by 0, zero check ok, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 3), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 5), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 2, + }, + { + "MOD32 by 0, zero check 1, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, + { + "MOD32 by 0, zero check 2, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, + { + "MOD64 by 0, zero check 1, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 2, + }, + { + "MOD64 by 0, zero check 2, cls", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = -1, + }, + /* Just make sure that JITs used udiv/umod as otherwise we get + * an exception from INT_MIN/-1 overflow similarly as with div + * by zero. + */ + { + "DIV32 overflow, check 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV32 overflow, check 2", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN), + BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV64 overflow, check 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, LLONG_MIN), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "DIV64 overflow, check 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_0, LLONG_MIN), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 0, }, + { + "MOD32 overflow, check 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = INT_MIN, + }, + { + "MOD32 overflow, check 2", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, INT_MIN), + BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = INT_MIN, + }, + { + "MOD64 overflow, check 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, LLONG_MIN), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, + { + "MOD64 overflow, check 2", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_2, LLONG_MIN), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, + { + "xor32 zero extend check", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, -1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_2, 0xffff), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_2, 0, 1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, { "empty prog", .insns = { }, - .errstr = "last insn is not an exit or jmp", + .errstr = "unknown opcode 00", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -374,7 +607,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU", + .errstr = "unknown opcode c4", }, { "arsh32 on reg", @@ -385,7 +618,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "BPF_ARSH not supported for 32 bit ALU", + .errstr = "unknown opcode cc", }, { "arsh64 on imm", @@ -501,7 +734,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X, 0, 0, 0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "BPF_CALL uses reserved", + .errstr = "unknown opcode 8d", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -691,7 +924,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_RAW_INSN(0, 0, 0, 0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid BPF_LD_IMM", + .errstr = "unknown opcode 00", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -709,7 +942,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_RAW_INSN(-1, 0, 0, 0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid BPF_ALU opcode f0", + .errstr = "unknown opcode ff", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -718,7 +951,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_RAW_INSN(-1, -1, -1, -1, -1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "invalid BPF_ALU opcode f0", + .errstr = "unknown opcode ff", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7543,7 +7776,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "BPF_END uses reserved fields", + .errstr = "unknown opcode d7", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -8963,6 +9196,90 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 1, }, + { + "calls: div by 0 in subprog", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 8), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 1), + BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, + { + "calls: multiple ret types in subprog 1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 8), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + }, + { + "calls: multiple ret types in subprog 2", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 8), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8), + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 9), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 64), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .fixup_map1 = { 16 }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R0 min value is outside of the array range", + }, { "calls: overlapping caller/callee", .insns = {