From: Anand Jain Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 05:53:21 +0000 (+0800) Subject: btrfs: add helper to obtain number of devices with ongoing dev-replace X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1da739678e0b7a764a0f1ef46886f919f19f6446;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git btrfs: add helper to obtain number of devices with ongoing dev-replace When the replace is running the fs_devices::num_devices also includes the replaced device, however in some operations like device delete and balance it needs the actual num_devices without the repalced devices. The function btrfs_num_devices() just provides that. And here is a scenario how balance and repalce items could co-exist: Consider balance is started and paused, now start the replace followed by a unmount or system power-cycle. During following mount, the open_ctree() first restarts the balance so it must check for the device replace otherwise our num_devices calculation will be wrong. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain Reviewed-by: David Sterba [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 3946fe951b60..ea9845a5e601 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -1854,6 +1854,24 @@ void btrfs_assign_next_active_device(struct btrfs_device *device, fs_info->fs_devices->latest_bdev = next_device->bdev; } +/* + * Return btrfs_fs_devices::num_devices excluding the device that's being + * currently replaced. + */ +static u64 btrfs_num_devices(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) +{ + u64 num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices; + + btrfs_dev_replace_read_lock(&fs_info->dev_replace); + if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&fs_info->dev_replace)) { + ASSERT(num_devices > 1); + num_devices--; + } + btrfs_dev_replace_read_unlock(&fs_info->dev_replace); + + return num_devices; +} + int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path, u64 devid) { @@ -1865,13 +1883,7 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path, mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex); - num_devices = fs_devices->num_devices; - btrfs_dev_replace_read_lock(&fs_info->dev_replace); - if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&fs_info->dev_replace)) { - ASSERT(num_devices > 1); - num_devices--; - } - btrfs_dev_replace_read_unlock(&fs_info->dev_replace); + num_devices = btrfs_num_devices(fs_info); ret = btrfs_check_raid_min_devices(fs_info, num_devices - 1); if (ret) @@ -3740,13 +3752,8 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, } } - num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->num_devices; - btrfs_dev_replace_read_lock(&fs_info->dev_replace); - if (btrfs_dev_replace_is_ongoing(&fs_info->dev_replace)) { - ASSERT(num_devices > 1); - num_devices--; - } - btrfs_dev_replace_read_unlock(&fs_info->dev_replace); + num_devices = btrfs_num_devices(fs_info); + allowed = BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP; if (num_devices > 1) allowed |= (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1);