From: Kirill Smelkov Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 08:33:01 +0000 (+0300) Subject: dtlk: remove double call to nonseekable_open X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=184012ad69b275a17d6fa40a8d4dcf15ef76c4d2;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git dtlk: remove double call to nonseekable_open dtlk_open currently has 2 calls to nonseekable_open which are both executed on success path. It was not hurting to make the extra call as nonseekable_open is only changing file->f_flags in idempotent way. However the first nonseekable_open is indeed both unneeded and looks suspicious. The first nonseekable_open was added in 6244f13c51 ("Fix up a couple of drivers - notable sg - for nonseekability."; 2004-Aug-7). The second nonseekable_open call was introduced in dc5c724584 ("Remove ESPIPE logic from drivers, letting the VFS layer handle it instead.; 2004-Aug-8). The latter patch being mass change probably missed to remove nonseekable_open that was introduced into dtlk_open the day before. Fix it: remove the extra/unneeded nonseekable_open call and leave the call to nonseekable_open only on the path where we are actually opening the file. Suggested-by: Pavel Machek Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov --- diff --git a/drivers/char/dtlk.c b/drivers/char/dtlk.c index f882460b5a44..669c3311adc4 100644 --- a/drivers/char/dtlk.c +++ b/drivers/char/dtlk.c @@ -298,7 +298,6 @@ static int dtlk_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) { TRACE_TEXT("(dtlk_open"); - nonseekable_open(inode, file); switch (iminor(inode)) { case DTLK_MINOR: if (dtlk_busy)