From: Ɓukasz Majewski Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:21:39 +0000 (+0200) Subject: FIX: fat: Provide correct return code from disk_{read|write} to upper layers X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0a04ed86cfaa36d93d55016d0b3dc3f06352a2fe;p=project%2Fbcm63xx%2Fu-boot.git FIX: fat: Provide correct return code from disk_{read|write} to upper layers It is very common that FAT code is using following pattern: if (disk_{read|write}() < 0) return -1; Up till now the above code was dead, since disk_{read|write) could only return value >= 0. As a result some errors from medium layer (i.e. eMMC/SD) were not caught. The above behavior was caused by block_{read|write|erase} declared at struct block_dev_desc (@part.h). It returns unsigned long, where 0 indicates error and > 0 indicates that medium operation was correct. This patch as error regards 0 returned from block_{read|write|erase} when nr_blocks is grater than zero. Read/Write operation with nr_blocks=0 should return 0 and hence is not considered as an error. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski Test HW: Odroid XU3 - Exynos 5433 --- diff --git a/fs/fat/fat.c b/fs/fat/fat.c index 06dcbb7005..f939bc5dee 100644 --- a/fs/fat/fat.c +++ b/fs/fat/fat.c @@ -46,11 +46,18 @@ static disk_partition_t cur_part_info; static int disk_read(__u32 block, __u32 nr_blocks, void *buf) { + ulong ret; + if (!cur_dev || !cur_dev->block_read) return -1; - return cur_dev->block_read(cur_dev->dev, - cur_part_info.start + block, nr_blocks, buf); + ret = cur_dev->block_read(cur_dev->dev, + cur_part_info.start + block, nr_blocks, buf); + + if (nr_blocks && ret == 0) + return -1; + + return ret; } int fat_set_blk_dev(block_dev_desc_t *dev_desc, disk_partition_t *info) diff --git a/fs/fat/fat_write.c b/fs/fat/fat_write.c index 98b88add83..adb6940dff 100644 --- a/fs/fat/fat_write.c +++ b/fs/fat/fat_write.c @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ static void uppercase(char *str, int len) static int total_sector; static int disk_write(__u32 block, __u32 nr_blocks, void *buf) { + ulong ret; + if (!cur_dev || !cur_dev->block_write) return -1; @@ -39,8 +41,13 @@ static int disk_write(__u32 block, __u32 nr_blocks, void *buf) return -1; } - return cur_dev->block_write(cur_dev->dev, - cur_part_info.start + block, nr_blocks, buf); + ret = cur_dev->block_write(cur_dev->dev, + cur_part_info.start + block, + nr_blocks, buf); + if (nr_blocks && ret == 0) + return -1; + + return ret; } /*