From: Stephen Boyd Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 19:06:02 +0000 (-0800) Subject: drm/msm/dpu: Convert to a chained irq chip X-Git-Url: http://git.lede-project.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=070e64dc1bbc879b7e0e9fffccd9dd139baf89f0;p=openwrt%2Fstaging%2Fblogic.git drm/msm/dpu: Convert to a chained irq chip Devices that make up DPU, i.e. graphics card, request their interrupts from this "virtual" interrupt chip. The interrupt chip builds upon a GIC SPI interrupt that raises high when any of the interrupts in the DPU's irq status register are triggered. From the kernel's perspective this is a chained irq chip, so requesting a flow handler for the GIC SPI and then calling generic IRQ handling code from that irq handler is not completely proper. It's better to convert this to a chained irq so that the GIC SPI irq doesn't appear in /proc/interrupts, can't have CPU affinity changed, and won't be accounted for with irq stats. Doing this also silences a recursive lockdep warning because we can specify a different lock class for the chained interrupts, silencing a warning that is easy to see with 'threadirqs' on the kernel commandline. WARNING: inconsistent lock state 4.19.10 #76 Tainted: G W -------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. irq/40-dpu_mdss/203 [HC0[0]:SC0[2]:HE1:SE0] takes: 0000000053ea9021 (&irq_desc_lock_class){?.-.}, at: handle_level_irq+0x34/0x26c {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: lock_acquire+0x244/0x360 _raw_spin_lock+0x64/0xa0 handle_fasteoi_irq+0x54/0x2ec generic_handle_irq+0x44/0x5c __handle_domain_irq+0x9c/0x11c gic_handle_irq+0x208/0x260 el1_irq+0xb4/0x130 arch_cpu_idle+0x178/0x3cc default_idle_call+0x3c/0x54 do_idle+0x1a8/0x3dc cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x28 rest_init+0x240/0x270 start_kernel+0x5a8/0x6bc irq event stamp: 18 hardirqs last enabled at (17): [] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x40/0xc0 hardirqs last disabled at (16): [] __schedule+0x20c/0x1bbc softirqs last enabled at (0): [] copy_process+0xb50/0x3964 softirqs last disabled at (18): [] local_bh_disable+0x8/0x20 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); *** DEADLOCK *** no locks held by irq/40-dpu_mdss/203. stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 203 Comm: irq/40-dpu_mdss Tainted: G W 4.19.10 #76 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x2f8 show_stack+0x20/0x2c __dump_stack+0x20/0x28 dump_stack+0xcc/0x10c mark_lock+0xbe0/0xe24 __lock_acquire+0x4cc/0x2708 lock_acquire+0x244/0x360 _raw_spin_lock+0x64/0xa0 handle_level_irq+0x34/0x26c generic_handle_irq+0x44/0x5c dpu_mdss_irq+0x64/0xec irq_forced_thread_fn+0x58/0x9c irq_thread+0x120/0x1dc kthread+0x248/0x260 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 ------------[ cut here ]------------ irq 169 handler irq_default_primary_handler+0x0/0x18 enabled interrupts Cc: Sean Paul Cc: Jordan Crouse Cc: Jayant Shekhar Cc: Rajesh Yadav Cc: Jeykumar Sankaran Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd Signed-off-by: Sean Paul --- diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c index cb307a2abf06..7316b4ab1b85 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_mdss.c @@ -23,11 +23,14 @@ struct dpu_mdss { struct dpu_irq_controller irq_controller; }; -static irqreturn_t dpu_mdss_irq(int irq, void *arg) +static void dpu_mdss_irq(struct irq_desc *desc) { - struct dpu_mdss *dpu_mdss = arg; + struct dpu_mdss *dpu_mdss = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); u32 interrupts; + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc); + interrupts = readl_relaxed(dpu_mdss->mmio + HW_INTR_STATUS); while (interrupts) { @@ -39,20 +42,20 @@ static irqreturn_t dpu_mdss_irq(int irq, void *arg) hwirq); if (mapping == 0) { DRM_ERROR("couldn't find irq mapping for %lu\n", hwirq); - return IRQ_NONE; + break; } rc = generic_handle_irq(mapping); if (rc < 0) { DRM_ERROR("handle irq fail: irq=%lu mapping=%u rc=%d\n", hwirq, mapping, rc); - return IRQ_NONE; + break; } interrupts &= ~(1 << hwirq); } - return IRQ_HANDLED; + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc); } static void dpu_mdss_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd) @@ -83,16 +86,16 @@ static struct irq_chip dpu_mdss_irq_chip = { .irq_unmask = dpu_mdss_irq_unmask, }; +static struct lock_class_key dpu_mdss_lock_key, dpu_mdss_request_key; + static int dpu_mdss_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int irq, irq_hw_number_t hwirq) { struct dpu_mdss *dpu_mdss = domain->host_data; - int ret; + irq_set_lockdep_class(irq, &dpu_mdss_lock_key, &dpu_mdss_request_key); irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &dpu_mdss_irq_chip, handle_level_irq); - ret = irq_set_chip_data(irq, dpu_mdss); - - return ret; + return irq_set_chip_data(irq, dpu_mdss); } static const struct irq_domain_ops dpu_mdss_irqdomain_ops = { @@ -159,11 +162,13 @@ static void dpu_mdss_destroy(struct drm_device *dev) struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private; struct dpu_mdss *dpu_mdss = to_dpu_mdss(priv->mdss); struct dss_module_power *mp = &dpu_mdss->mp; + int irq; pm_runtime_suspend(dev->dev); pm_runtime_disable(dev->dev); _dpu_mdss_irq_domain_fini(dpu_mdss); - free_irq(platform_get_irq(pdev, 0), dpu_mdss); + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, NULL, NULL); msm_dss_put_clk(mp->clk_config, mp->num_clk); devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, mp->clk_config); @@ -187,6 +192,7 @@ int dpu_mdss_init(struct drm_device *dev) struct dpu_mdss *dpu_mdss; struct dss_module_power *mp; int ret = 0; + int irq; dpu_mdss = devm_kzalloc(dev->dev, sizeof(*dpu_mdss), GFP_KERNEL); if (!dpu_mdss) @@ -219,12 +225,12 @@ int dpu_mdss_init(struct drm_device *dev) if (ret) goto irq_domain_error; - ret = request_irq(platform_get_irq(pdev, 0), - dpu_mdss_irq, 0, "dpu_mdss_isr", dpu_mdss); - if (ret) { - DPU_ERROR("failed to init irq: %d\n", ret); + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); + if (irq < 0) goto irq_error; - } + + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq, dpu_mdss_irq, + dpu_mdss); pm_runtime_enable(dev->dev);