objtool: Fix segfault in ignore_unreachable_insn()
authorJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Thu, 8 Feb 2018 23:09:25 +0000 (17:09 -0600)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:15:49 +0000 (01:15 +0100)
Peter Zijlstra's patch for converting WARN() to use UD2 triggered a
bunch of false "unreachable instruction" warnings, which then triggered
a seg fault in ignore_unreachable_insn().

The seg fault happened when it tried to dereference a NULL 'insn->func'
pointer.  Thanks to static_cpu_has(), some functions can jump to a
non-function area in the .altinstr_aux section.  That breaks
ignore_unreachable_insn()'s assumption that it's always inside the
original function.

Make sure ignore_unreachable_insn() only follows jumps within the
current function.

Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bace77a60d5af9b45eddb8f8fb9c776c8de657ef.1518130694.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
tools/objtool/check.c

index 2e458eb45586c484d1c376eecf2d6bdf80bfd317..c7fb5c2392ee6f39c39a3abdc3105d0efa1e3803 100644 (file)
@@ -1935,13 +1935,19 @@ static bool ignore_unreachable_insn(struct instruction *insn)
                if (is_kasan_insn(insn) || is_ubsan_insn(insn))
                        return true;
 
-               if (insn->type == INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL && insn->jump_dest) {
-                       insn = insn->jump_dest;
-                       continue;
+               if (insn->type == INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL) {
+                       if (insn->jump_dest &&
+                           insn->jump_dest->func == insn->func) {
+                               insn = insn->jump_dest;
+                               continue;
+                       }
+
+                       break;
                }
 
                if (insn->offset + insn->len >= insn->func->offset + insn->func->len)
                        break;
+
                insn = list_next_entry(insn, list);
        }