mvebu: add backported patch to reenable hw i/o coherency

Reported-by: Claudio Leite <leitec@staticky.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Kaloz <kaloz@openwrt.org>
SVN-Revision: 44621

diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/patches-3.18/025-ARM-mvebu-Use-arm_coherent_dma_ops.patch b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-3.18/025-ARM-mvebu-Use-arm_coherent_dma_ops.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..e3d1415
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-3.18/025-ARM-mvebu-Use-arm_coherent_dma_ops.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+From 1bd4d8a6de5cda605e8b99fbf081be2ea2959380 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
+Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:11:29 +0100
+Subject: ARM: mvebu: use arm_coherent_dma_ops and re-enable hardware I/O
+ coherency
+
+Now that we have enabled automatic I/O synchronization barriers, we no
+longer need any explicit barriers. We can therefore simplify
+arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c by using the existing
+arm_coherent_dma_ops instead of our custom mvebu_hwcc_dma_ops, and
+re-enable hardware I/O coherency support.
+
+Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
+[Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>: Remove forgotten comment]
+Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
+
+--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c
++++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/coherency.c
+@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
+ #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
+ #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
+ #include <asm/mach/map.h>
++#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
+ #include "armada-370-xp.h"
+ #include "coherency.h"
+ #include "mvebu-soc-id.h"
+@@ -223,59 +224,6 @@ static void __init armada_375_coherency_
+       coherency_wa_enabled = true;
+ }
+ 
+-static inline void mvebu_hwcc_sync_io_barrier(void)
+-{
+-      if (coherency_wa_enabled) {
+-              mvebu_hwcc_armada375_sync_io_barrier_wa();
+-              return;
+-      }
+-
+-      writel(0x1, coherency_cpu_base + IO_SYNC_BARRIER_CTL_OFFSET);
+-      while (readl(coherency_cpu_base + IO_SYNC_BARRIER_CTL_OFFSET) & 0x1);
+-}
+-
+-static dma_addr_t mvebu_hwcc_dma_map_page(struct device *dev, struct page *page,
+-                                unsigned long offset, size_t size,
+-                                enum dma_data_direction dir,
+-                                struct dma_attrs *attrs)
+-{
+-      if (dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE)
+-              mvebu_hwcc_sync_io_barrier();
+-      return pfn_to_dma(dev, page_to_pfn(page)) + offset;
+-}
+-
+-
+-static void mvebu_hwcc_dma_unmap_page(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
+-                            size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
+-                            struct dma_attrs *attrs)
+-{
+-      if (dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE)
+-              mvebu_hwcc_sync_io_barrier();
+-}
+-
+-static void mvebu_hwcc_dma_sync(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_handle,
+-                      size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
+-{
+-      if (dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE)
+-              mvebu_hwcc_sync_io_barrier();
+-}
+-
+-static struct dma_map_ops mvebu_hwcc_dma_ops = {
+-      .alloc                  = arm_dma_alloc,
+-      .free                   = arm_dma_free,
+-      .mmap                   = arm_dma_mmap,
+-      .map_page               = mvebu_hwcc_dma_map_page,
+-      .unmap_page             = mvebu_hwcc_dma_unmap_page,
+-      .get_sgtable            = arm_dma_get_sgtable,
+-      .map_sg                 = arm_dma_map_sg,
+-      .unmap_sg               = arm_dma_unmap_sg,
+-      .sync_single_for_cpu    = mvebu_hwcc_dma_sync,
+-      .sync_single_for_device = mvebu_hwcc_dma_sync,
+-      .sync_sg_for_cpu        = arm_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu,
+-      .sync_sg_for_device     = arm_dma_sync_sg_for_device,
+-      .set_dma_mask           = arm_dma_set_mask,
+-};
+-
+ static int mvebu_hwcc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+                              unsigned long event, void *__dev)
+ {
+@@ -283,7 +231,7 @@ static int mvebu_hwcc_notifier(struct no
+ 
+       if (event != BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE)
+               return NOTIFY_DONE;
+-      set_dma_ops(dev, &mvebu_hwcc_dma_ops);
++      set_dma_ops(dev, &arm_coherent_dma_ops);
+ 
+       return NOTIFY_OK;
+ }
+@@ -405,14 +353,9 @@ static int coherency_type(void)
+       return type;
+ }
+ 
+-/*
+- * As a precaution, we currently completely disable hardware I/O
+- * coherency, until enough testing is done with automatic I/O
+- * synchronization barriers to validate that it is a proper solution.
+- */
+ int coherency_available(void)
+ {
+-      return false;
++      return coherency_type() != COHERENCY_FABRIC_TYPE_NONE;
+ }
+ 
+ int __init coherency_init(void)