arm64: pmuv3: handle pmuv3+
authorMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:08:50 +0000 (12:08 +0100)
committerCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tue, 25 Apr 2017 14:12:59 +0000 (15:12 +0100)
Commit f1b36dcb5c316c27 ("arm64: pmuv3: handle !PMUv3 when probing") is
a little too restrictive, and prevents the use of of backwards
compatible PMUv3 extenstions, which have a PMUver value other than 1.

For instance, ARMv8.1 PMU extensions (as implemented by ThunderX2) are
reported with PMUver value 4.

Per the usual ID register principles, at least 0x1-0x7 imply a
PMUv3-compatible PMU. It's not currently clear whether 0x8-0xe imply the
same.

For the time being, treat the value as signed, and with 0x1-0x7 treated
as meaning PMUv3 is implemented. This may be relaxed by future patches.

Reported-by: Jayachandran C <jnair@caviumnetworks.com>
Tested-by: Jayachandran C <jnair@caviumnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c

index 98c749394c4bef7662f272126754728e8f6290cc..5f64d19a341196412c8f1748f1411f61f83d6ab6 100644 (file)
@@ -966,13 +966,14 @@ static void __armv8pmu_probe_pmu(void *info)
 {
        struct armv8pmu_probe_info *probe = info;
        struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = probe->pmu;
-       u64 dfr0, pmuver;
+       u64 dfr0;
        u32 pmceid[2];
+       int pmuver;
 
        dfr0 = read_sysreg(id_aa64dfr0_el1);
-       pmuver = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0,
+       pmuver = cpuid_feature_extract_signed_field(dfr0,
                        ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT);
-       if (pmuver != 1)
+       if (pmuver < 1)
                return;
 
        probe->present = true;