staging: lustre: fix sparse warnings related to lock context imbalance
authorLoic Pefferkorn <loic@loicp.eu>
Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:39:11 +0000 (20:39 +0100)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:59:15 +0000 (19:59 +0800)
Applies against next-20150120.

Add __acquires() and __releases() function annotations, to fix sparse warnings related to lock context imbalance.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

drivers/staging/lustre//lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-tracefile.c:153:5: warning: context imbalance in 'cfs_trace_lock_tcd' - wrong count at exit
drivers/staging/lustre//lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-tracefile.c:171:39: warning: context imbalance in 'cfs_trace_unlock_tcd' - unexpected unlock
drivers/staging/lustre//lustre/libcfs/hash.c:128:1: warning: context imbalance in 'cfs_hash_spin_lock' - wrong count at exit
drivers/staging/lustre//lustre/libcfs/hash.c:134:1: warning: context imbalance in 'cfs_hash_spin_unlock' - unexpected unlock
drivers/staging/lustre//lustre/libcfs/hash.c:142:9: warning: context imbalance in 'cfs_hash_rw_lock' - wrong count at exit
include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:219:9: warning: context imbalance in 'cfs_hash_rw_unlock' - unexpected unlock
drivers/staging/lustre//lustre/obdclass/cl_object.c:195:6: warning: context imbalance in 'cl_object_attr_lock' - wrong count at exit
drivers/staging/lustre//lustre/obdclass/cl_object.c:204:6: warning: context imbalance in 'cl_object_attr_unlock' - unexpected unlock

Signed-off-by: Loic Pefferkorn <loic@loicp.eu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/linux/linux-tracefile.c
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_object.c

index 2d1e6729e9965fe3ac63fec47c1da8a1d7e45e23..d89f81a2143ca7a2add8884fd968718c0c502a39 100644 (file)
@@ -126,18 +126,21 @@ cfs_hash_nl_unlock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive) {}
 
 static inline void
 cfs_hash_spin_lock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive)
+       __acquires(&lock->spin)
 {
        spin_lock(&lock->spin);
 }
 
 static inline void
 cfs_hash_spin_unlock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive)
+       __releases(&lock->spin)
 {
        spin_unlock(&lock->spin);
 }
 
 static inline void
 cfs_hash_rw_lock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive)
+       __acquires(&lock->rw)
 {
        if (!exclusive)
                read_lock(&lock->rw);
@@ -147,6 +150,7 @@ cfs_hash_rw_lock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive)
 
 static inline void
 cfs_hash_rw_unlock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive)
+       __releases(&lock->rw)
 {
        if (!exclusive)
                read_unlock(&lock->rw);
index fdc718966d21d0fa23762fd0e6bd02a78dbb3048..c8e293002e070b16977f270997a9029232e49b57 100644 (file)
@@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ cfs_trace_buf_type_t cfs_trace_buf_idx_get(void)
  * for details.
  */
 int cfs_trace_lock_tcd(struct cfs_trace_cpu_data *tcd, int walking)
+       __acquires(&tcd->tc_lock)
 {
        __LASSERT(tcd->tcd_type < CFS_TCD_TYPE_MAX);
        if (tcd->tcd_type == CFS_TCD_TYPE_IRQ)
@@ -165,6 +166,7 @@ int cfs_trace_lock_tcd(struct cfs_trace_cpu_data *tcd, int walking)
 }
 
 void cfs_trace_unlock_tcd(struct cfs_trace_cpu_data *tcd, int walking)
+       __releases(&tcd->tcd_lock)
 {
        __LASSERT(tcd->tcd_type < CFS_TCD_TYPE_MAX);
        if (tcd->tcd_type == CFS_TCD_TYPE_IRQ)
index c40bb6c458700fb346681efb46c40faad217b3e1..f13d1fbffd9d3f1a33a5e292732031ac5b409583 100644 (file)
@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ static spinlock_t *cl_object_attr_guard(struct cl_object *o)
  * cl_object_attr_get(), cl_object_attr_set().
  */
 void cl_object_attr_lock(struct cl_object *o)
+       __acquires(cl_object_attr_guard(o))
 {
        spin_lock(cl_object_attr_guard(o));
 }
@@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cl_object_attr_lock);
  * Releases data-attributes lock, acquired by cl_object_attr_lock().
  */
 void cl_object_attr_unlock(struct cl_object *o)
+       __releases(cl_object_attr_guard(o))
 {
        spin_unlock(cl_object_attr_guard(o));
 }