drm/i915: Balance assert_rpm_wakelock_held() for !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM)
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Thu, 25 Feb 2016 21:10:28 +0000 (21:10 +0000)
committerJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:40:46 +0000 (14:40 +0200)
commit 09731280028ce03e6a27e1998137f1775a2839f3
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Feb 17 14:17:42 2016 +0200

    drm/i915: Add helper to get a display power ref if it was already enabled

left the rpm wakelock assertions unbalanced if CONFIG_PM was disabled as
intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use() would return true without incrementing
the local bookkeeping required for the assertions.

Fixes: 09731280028c ("drm/i915: Add helper to get a display power ref if it was already enabled")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
CC: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1456434628-22574-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 135dc79efbc119ea5fb34475996983159e6ca31c)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c

index ef8d24d9a50f08fd264369cbce42c204a85ab672..4f43d9b32e6639a9f12db67ba0da213ae440f982 100644 (file)
@@ -2349,22 +2349,20 @@ bool intel_runtime_pm_get_if_in_use(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
        struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
        struct device *device = &dev->pdev->dev;
-       int ret;
 
-       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM))
-               return true;
+       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM)) {
+               int ret = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(device);
 
-       ret = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(device);
-
-       /*
-        * In cases runtime PM is disabled by the RPM core and we get an
-        * -EINVAL return value we are not supposed to call this function,
-        * since the power state is undefined. This applies atm to the
-        * late/early system suspend/resume handlers.
-        */
-       WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0);
-       if (ret <= 0)
-               return false;
+               /*
+                * In cases runtime PM is disabled by the RPM core and we get
+                * an -EINVAL return value we are not supposed to call this
+                * function, since the power state is undefined. This applies
+                * atm to the late/early system suspend/resume handlers.
+                */
+               WARN_ON_ONCE(ret < 0);
+               if (ret <= 0)
+                       return false;
+       }
 
        atomic_inc(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count);
        assert_rpm_wakelock_held(dev_priv);