Currently X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT, X86EMUL_RETRY_INSTR and
X86EMUL_CMPXCHG_FAILED have the same value so caller cannot
distinguish why function such as emulator_cmpxchg_emulated()
(which can return both X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT and
X86EMUL_CMPXCHG_FAILED) failed.
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
#define X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE 1
/* Terminate emulation but return success to the caller. */
#define X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT 2 /* propagate a generated fault to guest */
-#define X86EMUL_RETRY_INSTR 2 /* retry the instruction for some reason */
-#define X86EMUL_CMPXCHG_FAILED 2 /* cmpxchg did not see expected value */
+#define X86EMUL_RETRY_INSTR 3 /* retry the instruction for some reason */
+#define X86EMUL_CMPXCHG_FAILED 4 /* cmpxchg did not see expected value */
+
struct x86_emulate_ops {
/*
* read_std: Read bytes of standard (non-emulated/special) memory.