[PATCH] mm: dirty_exceeded speedup
authorAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 01:42:26 +0000 (17:42 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 03:20:17 +0000 (19:20 -0800)
Ravikiran reports that this variable is bouncing all around nodes on NUMA
machines, causing measurable performance problems.  Fix that up by only
writing to it when it actually changed.

And put it in a new cacheline to prevent it sharing with other things (this
happened).

Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
mm/page-writeback.c

index 5240e426c1f771d24febb3ac60c8b375e794d28d..945559fb63d208bb5c10543aece7b117e84d3e97 100644 (file)
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 static long ratelimit_pages = 32;
 
 static long total_pages;       /* The total number of pages in the machine. */
-static int dirty_exceeded;     /* Dirty mem may be over limit */
+static int dirty_exceeded __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;  /* Dirty mem may be over limit */
 
 /*
  * When balance_dirty_pages decides that the caller needs to perform some
@@ -212,7 +212,8 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
                if (nr_reclaimable + wbs.nr_writeback <= dirty_thresh)
                        break;
 
-               dirty_exceeded = 1;
+               if (!dirty_exceeded)
+                       dirty_exceeded = 1;
 
                /* Note: nr_reclaimable denotes nr_dirty + nr_unstable.
                 * Unstable writes are a feature of certain networked
@@ -234,7 +235,7 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct address_space *mapping)
                blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
        }
 
-       if (nr_reclaimable + wbs.nr_writeback <= dirty_thresh)
+       if (nr_reclaimable + wbs.nr_writeback <= dirty_thresh && dirty_exceeded)
                dirty_exceeded = 0;
 
        if (writeback_in_progress(bdi))