kernfs: fix get_active failure handling in kernfs_seq_*()

When kernfs_seq_start() fails to obtain an active reference, it
returns ERR_PTR(-ENODEV).  kernfs_seq_stop() is then invoked with the
error pointer value; however, it still proceeds to invoke
kernfs_put_active() on the node leading to unbalanced put.

If kernfs_seq_stop() is called even after active ref failure, it
should skip invocation of @ops->seq_stop() and put_active.
Unfortunately, this is a bit complicated because active ref failure
isn't the only thing which may fail with ERR_PTR(-ENODEV).
@ops->seq_start/next() may also fail with the error value and
kernfs_seq_stop() doesn't have a way to tell apart those failures.

Work it around by factoring out the active part of kernfs_seq_stop()
into kernfs_seq_stop_active() and invoking it directly if
@ops->seq_start/next() fail with ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) and updating
kernfs_seq_stop() to skip kernfs_seq_stop_active() on
ERR_PTR(-ENODEV).  This is a bit nasty but ensures that the active put
is skipped iff get_active failed in kernfs_seq_start().

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/fs/kernfs/file.c b/fs/kernfs/file.c
index 316604cc3a1c9790ea5fb66ef92a89f123db6428..bdd38854ef65bd5d3191b97dd43ddcb16a717c3a 100644 (file)
--- a/fs/kernfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/file.c
@@ -54,6 +54,38 @@ static const struct kernfs_ops *kernfs_ops(struct kernfs_node *kn)
        return kn->attr.ops;
 }
 
+/*
+ * As kernfs_seq_stop() is also called after kernfs_seq_start() or
+ * kernfs_seq_next() failure, it needs to distinguish whether it's stopping
+ * a seq_file iteration which is fully initialized with an active reference
+ * or an aborted kernfs_seq_start() due to get_active failure.  The
+ * position pointer is the only context for each seq_file iteration and
+ * thus the stop condition should be encoded in it.  As the return value is
+ * directly visible to userland, ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) is the only acceptable
+ * choice to indicate get_active failure.
+ *
+ * Unfortunately, this is complicated due to the optional custom seq_file
+ * operations which may return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) too.  kernfs_seq_stop()
+ * can't distinguish whether ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) is from get_active failure or
+ * custom seq_file operations and thus can't decide whether put_active
+ * should be performed or not only on ERR_PTR(-ENODEV).
+ *
+ * This is worked around by factoring out the custom seq_stop() and
+ * put_active part into kernfs_seq_stop_active(), skipping it from
+ * kernfs_seq_stop() if ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) while invoking it directly after
+ * custom seq_file operations fail with ERR_PTR(-ENODEV) - this ensures
+ * that kernfs_seq_stop_active() is skipped only after get_active failure.
+ */
+static void kernfs_seq_stop_active(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
+{
+       struct kernfs_open_file *of = sf->private;
+       const struct kernfs_ops *ops = kernfs_ops(of->kn);
+
+       if (ops->seq_stop)
+               ops->seq_stop(sf, v);
+       kernfs_put_active(of->kn);
+}
+
 static void *kernfs_seq_start(struct seq_file *sf, loff_t *ppos)
 {
        struct kernfs_open_file *of = sf->private;
@@ -69,7 +101,11 @@ static void *kernfs_seq_start(struct seq_file *sf, loff_t *ppos)
 
        ops = kernfs_ops(of->kn);
        if (ops->seq_start) {
-               return ops->seq_start(sf, ppos);
+               void *next = ops->seq_start(sf, ppos);
+               /* see the comment above kernfs_seq_stop_active() */
+               if (next == ERR_PTR(-ENODEV))
+                       kernfs_seq_stop_active(sf, next);
+               return next;
        } else {
                /*
                 * The same behavior and code as single_open().  Returns
@@ -85,7 +121,11 @@ static void *kernfs_seq_next(struct seq_file *sf, void *v, loff_t *ppos)
        const struct kernfs_ops *ops = kernfs_ops(of->kn);
 
        if (ops->seq_next) {
-               return ops->seq_next(sf, v, ppos);
+               void *next = ops->seq_next(sf, v, ppos);
+               /* see the comment above kernfs_seq_stop_active() */
+               if (next == ERR_PTR(-ENODEV))
+                       kernfs_seq_stop_active(sf, next);
+               return next;
        } else {
                /*
                 * The same behavior and code as single_open(), always
@@ -99,12 +139,9 @@ static void *kernfs_seq_next(struct seq_file *sf, void *v, loff_t *ppos)
 static void kernfs_seq_stop(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
 {
        struct kernfs_open_file *of = sf->private;
-       const struct kernfs_ops *ops = kernfs_ops(of->kn);
 
-       if (ops->seq_stop)
-               ops->seq_stop(sf, v);
-
-       kernfs_put_active(of->kn);
+       if (v != ERR_PTR(-ENODEV))
+               kernfs_seq_stop_active(sf, v);
        mutex_unlock(&of->mutex);
 }