selftests/bpf: fix test_align liveliness expectations

Commit 2589726d12a1 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops") caused a change
in the way some registers liveliness is reported in the test_align.
Add missing "_w" to a couple of tests. Note, there are no offset
changes!

Fixes: 2589726d12a1 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops")
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
index 3c789d03b629d222618a18d168883615c0661ec8..0262f7b374f9cf0df0eb5fa789f16c5abd92d21f 100644 (file)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
                },
                .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
                .matches = {
-                       {7, "R0=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8,imm=0)"},
+                       {7, "R0_w=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8,imm=0)"},
                        {7, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"},
                        {8, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=510,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe))"},
                        {9, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"},
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
                        /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known
                         * alignment of 4.
                         */
-                       {8, "R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"},
+                       {8, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"},
                        {8, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"},
                        /* Offset is added to packet pointer R5, resulting in
                         * known fixed offset, and variable offset from R6.
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
                        /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known
                         * alignment of 4.
                         */
-                       {8, "R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"},
+                       {8, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"},
                        {8, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"},
                        /* Adding 14 makes R6 be (4n+2) */
                        {9, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"},
@@ -473,12 +473,12 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
                        /* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2).  We blow our bounds, because
                         * the add could overflow.
                         */
-                       {7, "R5=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"},
+                       {7, "R5_w=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"},
                        /* Checked s>=0 */
                        {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
                        /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */
                        {11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
-                       {13, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
+                       {13, "R4_w=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
                        /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine.
                         * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able
                         * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
                         * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access
                         * attempt will fail.
                         */
-                       {15, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
+                       {15, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
                }
        },
        {
@@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
                        /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known
                         * alignment of 4.
                         */
-                       {7, "R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"},
+                       {7, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"},
                        {9, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"},
                        /* Adding 14 makes R6 be (4n+2) */
                        {10, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"},
@@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
                        /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known
                         * alignment of 4.
                         */
-                       {7, "R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"},
+                       {7, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"},
                        {10, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=60,var_off=(0x0; 0x3c))"},
                        /* Adding 14 makes R6 be (4n+2) */
                        {11, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=74,var_off=(0x2; 0x7c))"},