Jun Wu at Facebook reported that an internal service was seeing a return
value of 1 from ftruncate() on Btrfs in some cases. This is coming from
the NEED_TRUNCATE_BLOCK return value from btrfs_truncate_inode_items().
btrfs_truncate() uses two variables for error handling, ret and err.
When btrfs_truncate_inode_items() returns non-zero, we set err to the
return value. However, NEED_TRUNCATE_BLOCK is not an error. Make sure we
only set err if ret is an error (i.e., negative).
To reproduce the issue: mount a filesystem with -o compress-force=zstd
and the following program will encounter return value of 1 from
ftruncate:
int main(void) {
char buf[256] = { 0 };
int ret;
int fd;
fd = open("test", O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, 0666);
if (fd == -1) {
perror("open");
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (write(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)) != sizeof(buf)) {
perror("write");
close(fd);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
if (fsync(fd) == -1) {
perror("fsync");
close(fd);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
ret = ftruncate(fd, 128);
if (ret) {
printf("ftruncate() returned %d\n", ret);
close(fd);
return EXIT_FAILURE;
}
close(fd);
return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}
Fixes: ddfae63cc8e0 ("btrfs: move btrfs_truncate_block out of trans handle")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.15+
Reported-by: Jun Wu <quark@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY);
trans->block_rsv = &fs_info->trans_block_rsv;
if (ret != -ENOSPC && ret != -EAGAIN) {
- err = ret;
+ if (ret < 0)
+ err = ret;
break;
}