rxrpc_lose_skb() is now exactly the same as rxrpc_free_skb(), so remove it
and use the latter instead.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
void rxrpc_see_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_get_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_free_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
-void rxrpc_lose_skb(struct sk_buff *, enum rxrpc_skb_trace);
void rxrpc_purge_queue(struct sk_buff_head *);
/*
static int lose;
if ((lose++ & 7) == 7) {
trace_rxrpc_rx_lose(sp);
- rxrpc_lose_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_rx_lost);
+ rxrpc_free_skb(skb, rxrpc_skb_rx_lost);
return;
}
}
}
}
-/*
- * Note the injected loss of a socket buffer.
- */
-void rxrpc_lose_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, enum rxrpc_skb_trace op)
-{
- const void *here = __builtin_return_address(0);
- if (skb) {
- int n;
- CHECK_SLAB_OKAY(&skb->users);
- n = atomic_dec_return(select_skb_count(op));
- trace_rxrpc_skb(skb, op, refcount_read(&skb->users), n, here);
- kfree_skb(skb);
- }
-}
-
/*
* Clear a queue of socket buffers.
*/