[ARM] 3023/1: pxa-regs: Typo in ARM pxa register definitions.
authorPaul Schulz <pschulz01@gmail.com>
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:40:32 +0000 (19:40 +0100)
committerRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:40:32 +0000 (19:40 +0100)
Patch from Paul Schulz

The following trivial patch is to fix what looks like a typo in the PXA register
definitions. The correction comes directly from the definition in the
Intel Documentation.

 http://www.intel.com/design/pca/applicationsprocessors/manuals/278693.htm
 Intel(R) PXA 255 Processor - Developers Manual - Jan 2004 - Page 12-33

Neither 'UDCCS_IO_ROF' or 'UDCCS_IO_DME' are currently used elseware
in the main code (from grep of tree)... The current definitions have been
in the code since at lease 2.4.7.

Signed-off-by: Paul Schulz <paul@mawsonlakes.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
include/asm-arm/arch-pxa/pxa-regs.h

index 13fa2deb4dddfca1dc5237558cf14d359ab67c3a..3af7165ab0d738702eff0d17e43f3348d5158750 100644 (file)
 
 #define UDCCS_IO_RFS   (1 << 0)        /* Receive FIFO service */
 #define UDCCS_IO_RPC   (1 << 1)        /* Receive packet complete */
-#define UDCCS_IO_ROF   (1 << 3)        /* Receive overflow */
+#define UDCCS_IO_ROF   (1 << 2)        /* Receive overflow */
 #define UDCCS_IO_DME   (1 << 3)        /* DMA enable */
 #define UDCCS_IO_RNE   (1 << 6)        /* Receive FIFO not empty */
 #define UDCCS_IO_RSP   (1 << 7)        /* Receive short packet */