Patch from Paul Schulz
The following trivial patch is to fix what looks like a typo in the PXA register
definitions. The correction comes directly from the definition in the
Intel Documentation.
http://www.intel.com/design/pca/applicationsprocessors/manuals/278693.htm
Intel(R) PXA 255 Processor - Developers Manual - Jan 2004 - Page 12-33
Neither 'UDCCS_IO_ROF' or 'UDCCS_IO_DME' are currently used elseware
in the main code (from grep of tree)... The current definitions have been
in the code since at lease 2.4.7.
Signed-off-by: Paul Schulz <paul@mawsonlakes.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
#define UDCCS_IO_RFS (1 << 0) /* Receive FIFO service */
#define UDCCS_IO_RPC (1 << 1) /* Receive packet complete */
-#define UDCCS_IO_ROF (1 << 3) /* Receive overflow */
+#define UDCCS_IO_ROF (1 << 2) /* Receive overflow */
#define UDCCS_IO_DME (1 << 3) /* DMA enable */
#define UDCCS_IO_RNE (1 << 6) /* Receive FIFO not empty */
#define UDCCS_IO_RSP (1 << 7) /* Receive short packet */