use a do...while loop rather than a for loop to get slightly better
optimization and to avoid gcc "may be used uninitialized" warnings ...
we know that the [id]cplb_nr_bounds variables will never be 0, so this
is OK
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
nr_icplb_supv_miss[cpu]++;
base = 0;
- for (idx = 0; idx < icplb_nr_bounds; idx++) {
+ idx = 0;
+ do {
eaddr = icplb_bounds[idx].eaddr;
if (addr < eaddr)
break;
base = eaddr;
- }
+ } while (++idx < icplb_nr_bounds);
+
if (unlikely(idx == icplb_nr_bounds))
return CPLB_NO_ADDR_MATCH;
nr_dcplb_supv_miss[cpu]++;
base = 0;
- for (idx = 0; idx < dcplb_nr_bounds; idx++) {
+ idx = 0;
+ do {
eaddr = dcplb_bounds[idx].eaddr;
if (addr < eaddr)
break;
base = eaddr;
- }
+ } while (++idx < dcplb_nr_bounds);
+
if (unlikely(idx == dcplb_nr_bounds))
return CPLB_NO_ADDR_MATCH;