Below Sparsh warnings are fixed.
Commit: drm: revocation check at drm subsystem
+drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c:235:6: warning: symbol
'drm_hdcp_request_srm' was not declared. Should it be static?
+drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c:27:3: warning: symbol 'srm_data' was not
declared. Should it be static?
+drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c:317:5: warning: symbol 'drm_setup_hdcp_srm'
was not declared. Should it be static?
+drivers/gpu/drm/drm_hdcp.c:327:6: warning: symbol
'drm_teardown_hdcp_srm' was not declared. Should it be static?
cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190513133504.18612-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com
#include <drm/drm_mode_object.h>
#include <drm/drm_connector.h>
-struct hdcp_srm {
+#include "drm_internal.h"
+
+static struct hdcp_srm {
u32 revoked_ksv_cnt;
u8 *revoked_ksv_list;
drm_hdcp_parse_hdcp2_srm(buf, count);
}
-void drm_hdcp_request_srm(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
+static void drm_hdcp_request_srm(struct drm_device *drm_dev)
{
char fw_name[36] = "display_hdcp_srm.bin";
const struct firmware *fw;
void drm_sysfs_lease_event(struct drm_device *dev);
/* drm_gem.c */
+struct drm_gem_object;
int drm_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev);
void drm_gem_destroy(struct drm_device *dev);
int drm_gem_handle_create_tail(struct drm_file *file_priv,