Nowadays, nlmsg_multicast() returns only 0 or -ESRCH but this was not the
case when commit
134e63756d5f was pushed.
However, there was no reason to stop the loop if a netns does not have
listeners.
Returns -ESRCH only if there was no listeners in all netns.
To avoid having the same problem in the future, I didn't take the
assumption that nlmsg_multicast() returns only 0 or -ESRCH.
Fixes: 134e63756d5f ("genetlink: make netns aware")
CC: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
{
struct sk_buff *tmp;
struct net *net, *prev = NULL;
+ bool delivered = false;
int err;
for_each_net_rcu(net) {
}
err = nlmsg_multicast(prev->genl_sock, tmp,
portid, group, flags);
- if (err)
+ if (!err)
+ delivered = true;
+ else if (err != -ESRCH)
goto error;
}
prev = net;
}
- return nlmsg_multicast(prev->genl_sock, skb, portid, group, flags);
+ err = nlmsg_multicast(prev->genl_sock, skb, portid, group, flags);
+ if (!err)
+ delivered = true;
+ else if (err != -ESRCH)
+ goto error;
+ return delivered ? 0 : -ESRCH;
error:
kfree_skb(skb);
return err;