Eric Hugne reported following error :
I'm hitting this warning on latest net-next when i try to SSH into a machine
with eth0 added to a bridge (but i think the problem is older than that)
Steps to reproduce:
node2 ~ # brctl addif br0 eth0
[ 223.758785] device eth0 entered promiscuous mode
node2 ~ # ip link set br0 up
[ 244.503614] br0: port 1(eth0) entered forwarding state
[ 244.505108] br0: port 1(eth0) entered forwarding state
node2 ~ # [ 251.160159] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 251.160831] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3 at include/net/request_sock.h:102 tcp_v4_err+0x6b1/0x720()
[ 251.162077] Modules linked in:
[ 251.162496] CPU: 0 PID: 3 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 4.0.0-rc3+ #18
[ 251.163334] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[ 251.164078]
ffffffff81a8365c ffff880038a6ba18 ffffffff8162ace4 0000000000009898
[ 251.165084]
0000000000000000 ffff880038a6ba58 ffffffff8104da85 ffff88003fa437c0
[ 251.166195]
ffff88003fa437c0 ffff88003fa74e00 ffff88003fa43bb8 ffff88003fad99a0
[ 251.167203] Call Trace:
[ 251.167533] [<
ffffffff8162ace4>] dump_stack+0x45/0x57
[ 251.168206] [<
ffffffff8104da85>] warn_slowpath_common+0x85/0xc0
[ 251.169239] [<
ffffffff8104db65>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
[ 251.170271] [<
ffffffff81559d51>] tcp_v4_err+0x6b1/0x720
[ 251.171408] [<
ffffffff81630d03>] ? _raw_read_lock_irq+0x3/0x10
[ 251.172589] [<
ffffffff81534e20>] ? inet_del_offload+0x40/0x40
[ 251.173366] [<
ffffffff81569295>] icmp_socket_deliver+0x65/0xb0
[ 251.174134] [<
ffffffff815693a2>] icmp_unreach+0xc2/0x280
[ 251.174820] [<
ffffffff8156a82d>] icmp_rcv+0x2bd/0x3a0
[ 251.175473] [<
ffffffff81534ea2>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x82/0x1e0
[ 251.176282] [<
ffffffff815354d8>] ip_local_deliver+0x88/0x90
[ 251.177004] [<
ffffffff815350f0>] ip_rcv_finish+0xf0/0x310
[ 251.177693] [<
ffffffff815357bc>] ip_rcv+0x2dc/0x390
[ 251.178336] [<
ffffffff814f5da3>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x713/0xa20
[ 251.179170] [<
ffffffff814f7fca>] __netif_receive_skb+0x1a/0x80
[ 251.179922] [<
ffffffff814f97d4>] process_backlog+0x94/0x120
[ 251.180639] [<
ffffffff814f9612>] net_rx_action+0x1e2/0x310
[ 251.181356] [<
ffffffff81051267>] __do_softirq+0xa7/0x290
[ 251.182046] [<
ffffffff81051469>] run_ksoftirqd+0x19/0x30
[ 251.182726] [<
ffffffff8106cc23>] smpboot_thread_fn+0x153/0x1d0
[ 251.183485] [<
ffffffff8106cad0>] ? SyS_setgroups+0x130/0x130
[ 251.184228] [<
ffffffff8106935e>] kthread+0xee/0x110
[ 251.184871] [<
ffffffff81069270>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1b0/0x1b0
[ 251.185690] [<
ffffffff81631108>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[ 251.186385] [<
ffffffff81069270>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x1b0/0x1b0
[ 251.187216] ---[ end trace
c947fc7b24e42ea1 ]---
[ 259.542268] br0: port 1(eth0) entered forwarding state
Remove the double calls to reqsk_put()
[edumazet] :
I got confused because reqsk_timer_handler() _has_ to call
reqsk_put(req) after calling inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(), as
the timer handler holds a reference on req.
Signed-off-by: Fan Du <fan.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com>
Fixes: fa76ce7328b2 ("inet: get rid of central tcp/dccp listener timer")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
if (!between48(seq, dccp_rsk(req)->dreq_iss, dccp_rsk(req)->dreq_gss)) {
NET_INC_STATS_BH(net, LINUX_MIB_OUTOFWINDOWICMPS);
+ reqsk_put(req);
} else {
/*
* Still in RESPOND, just remove it silently.
*/
inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(req->rsk_listener, req);
}
- reqsk_put(req);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dccp_req_err);
if (seq != tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn) {
NET_INC_STATS_BH(net, LINUX_MIB_OUTOFWINDOWICMPS);
+ reqsk_put(req);
} else {
/*
* Still in SYN_RECV, just remove it silently.
* created socket, and POSIX does not want network
* errors returned from accept().
*/
- inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(req->rsk_listener, req);
NET_INC_STATS_BH(net, LINUX_MIB_LISTENDROPS);
+ inet_csk_reqsk_queue_drop(req->rsk_listener, req);
}
- reqsk_put(req);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_req_err);