The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit
76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200225011709.GA601@embeddedor
uint8_t bsstype;
uint8_t bssid[ETH_ALEN];
- uint8_t tlvbuffer[0];
+ uint8_t tlvbuffer[];
} __packed;
struct cmd_ds_802_11_scan_rsp {
__le16 bssdescriptsize;
uint8_t nr_sets;
- uint8_t bssdesc_and_tlvbuffer[0];
+ uint8_t bssdesc_and_tlvbuffer[];
} __packed;
struct cmd_ds_802_11_get_log {
struct if_sdio_packet {
struct if_sdio_packet *next;
u16 nb;
- u8 buffer[0] __attribute__((aligned(4)));
+ u8 buffer[] __aligned(4);
};
struct if_sdio_card {
struct if_spi_packet {
struct list_head list;
u16 blen;
- u8 buffer[0] __attribute__((aligned(4)));
+ u8 buffer[] __aligned(4);
};
struct if_spi_card {
struct fwdata {
struct fwheader hdr;
__le32 seqnum;
- uint8_t data[0];
+ uint8_t data[];
};
/* fwsyncheader */