Making sure ee_block is initialized to zero to prevent gcc from
kvetching. It's harmless (although it's not obvious that it's
harmless) from code inspection:
fs/ext4/move_extent.c:478: warning: 'start_ext.ee_block' may be used
uninitialized in this function
Thanks to Stefan Richter for first bringing this to the attention of
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: LiuQi <lingjiujianke@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
int depth = ext_depth(orig_inode);
int ret;
+ start_ext.ee_block = end_ext.ee_block = 0;
o_start = o_end = oext = orig_path[depth].p_ext;
oext_alen = ext4_ext_get_actual_len(oext);
start_ext.ee_len = end_ext.ee_len = 0;