Clang generates a warning when it sees a logical not followed by a
conditional operator like ==, >, or <.
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c:470:6: warning: logical not is
only applied to the left hand side of this comparison
[-Wlogical-not-parentheses]
if (!spsc_queue_count(&entity->job_queue) == 0 ||
^ ~~
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c:470:6: note: add parentheses
after the '!' to evaluate the comparison first
if (!spsc_queue_count(&entity->job_queue) == 0 ||
^
( )
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c:470:6: note: add parentheses
around left hand side expression to silence this warning
if (!spsc_queue_count(&entity->job_queue) == 0 ||
^
( )
1 warning generated.
It assumes the author might have made a mistake in their logic:
if (!a == b) -> if (!(a == b))
Sometimes that is the case; other times, it's just a super convoluted
way of saying 'if (a)' when b = 0:
if (!1 == 0) -> if (0 == 0) -> if (true)
Alternatively:
if (!1 == 0) -> if (!!1) -> if (1)
Simplify this comparison so that Clang doesn't complain.
Fixes: 35e160e781a0 ("drm/scheduler: change entities rq even earlier")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
struct dma_fence *fence;
struct drm_sched_rq *rq;
- if (!spsc_queue_count(&entity->job_queue) == 0 ||
- entity->num_rq_list <= 1)
+ if (spsc_queue_count(&entity->job_queue) || entity->num_rq_list <= 1)
return;
fence = READ_ONCE(entity->last_scheduled);