drm/i915/gt: Include a tell-tale for engine parking
authorChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:41:54 +0000 (12:41 +0000)
committerChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Wed, 22 Jan 2020 17:10:15 +0000 (17:10 +0000)
We have two trace messages that rely on the function name for
distinction. However, if gcc inlines the function, the two traces end up
with the same function name and are indistinguishable. Add a different
message to each to clarify which one we hit, i.e. which phase of engine
parking we are processing.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122124154.483444-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_pm.c

index ea90ab3e396ef14d3aa8132392df4cb475e004d7..b6cf284e3a2d5b970ee7c144a78ad5bef53a03d7 100644 (file)
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ __queue_and_release_pm(struct i915_request *rq,
 {
        struct intel_gt_timelines *timelines = &engine->gt->timelines;
 
-       ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "\n");
+       ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "parking\n");
 
        /*
         * We have to serialise all potential retirement paths with our
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int __engine_park(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
        if (!switch_to_kernel_context(engine))
                return -EBUSY;
 
-       ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "\n");
+       ENGINE_TRACE(engine, "parked\n");
 
        call_idle_barriers(engine); /* cleanup after wedging */