x86: use PTE_MASK rather than ad-hoc mask
authorJeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Tue, 20 May 2008 07:26:23 +0000 (08:26 +0100)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Tue, 20 May 2008 14:51:21 +0000 (07:51 -0700)
Use ~PTE_MASK to extract the non-pfn parts of the pte (ie, the pte
flags), rather than constructing an ad-hoc mask.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Tested-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
include/asm-x86/pgtable.h

index b816134f753a63eb5cb94dc7ea60be767985b470..97c271b2910b3266b4aaafa53385dfd8148bf374 100644 (file)
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static inline pgprot_t pgprot_modify(pgprot_t oldprot, pgprot_t newprot)
        return __pgprot(preservebits | addbits);
 }
 
-#define pte_pgprot(x) __pgprot(pte_val(x) & (0xfff | _PAGE_NX))
+#define pte_pgprot(x) __pgprot(pte_val(x) & ~PTE_MASK)
 
 #define canon_pgprot(p) __pgprot(pgprot_val(p) & __supported_pte_mask)