sched/fair: Explain why MIN_SHARES isn't scaled in calc_cfs_shares()

Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e9a4d858-bcf3-36b9-e3a9-449953e34569@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 2b866a279bdf13d696ddb2718d3429472b009828..274c747a01ce4862307f4a97286db68e6a753824 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2657,6 +2657,18 @@ static long calc_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_group *tg)
        if (tg_weight)
                shares /= tg_weight;
 
+       /*
+        * MIN_SHARES has to be unscaled here to support per-CPU partitioning
+        * of a group with small tg->shares value. It is a floor value which is
+        * assigned as a minimum load.weight to the sched_entity representing
+        * the group on a CPU.
+        *
+        * E.g. on 64-bit for a group with tg->shares of scale_load(15)=15*1024
+        * on an 8-core system with 8 tasks each runnable on one CPU shares has
+        * to be 15*1024*1/8=1920 instead of scale_load(MIN_SHARES)=2*1024. In
+        * case no task is runnable on a CPU MIN_SHARES=2 should be returned
+        * instead of 0.
+        */
        if (shares < MIN_SHARES)
                shares = MIN_SHARES;
        if (shares > tg->shares)