Commits such as
65dd297ac25565 ("xfs: %pF is only for function
pointers") caused a regression because pretty_print() didn't support
%ps/%pS. The current %pf/%pF implementation in pretty_print() is what
%ps/%pS is supposed to do, so use the same code for %ps/%pS.
Addressing the incorrect %pf/%pF implementation is beyond the scope of
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150831211637.GA12848@home.buserror.net
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
else
ls = 2;
- if (*(ptr+1) == 'F' ||
- *(ptr+1) == 'f') {
+ if (*(ptr+1) == 'F' || *(ptr+1) == 'f' ||
+ *(ptr+1) == 'S' || *(ptr+1) == 's') {
ptr++;
show_func = *ptr;
} else if (*(ptr+1) == 'M' || *(ptr+1) == 'm') {