#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
-@@ -136,6 +137,8 @@ static int brcm_nvram_probe(struct platf
+@@ -139,6 +140,8 @@ static int brcm_nvram_probe(struct platf
if (err)
return err;
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
-@@ -136,6 +137,8 @@ static int brcm_nvram_probe(struct platf
+@@ -139,6 +140,8 @@ static int brcm_nvram_probe(struct platf
if (err)
return err;
--- /dev/null
+From b0576ade3aaf24b376ea1a4406ae138e2a22b0c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
+Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:40:06 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: brcm_nvram: Add check for kzalloc
+
+Add the check for the return value of kzalloc in order to avoid
+NULL pointer dereference.
+
+Fixes: 6e977eaa8280 ("nvmem: brcm_nvram: parse NVRAM content into NVMEM cells")
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
+Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127104015.23839-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/nvmem/brcm_nvram.c | 3 +++
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/nvmem/brcm_nvram.c
++++ b/drivers/nvmem/brcm_nvram.c
+@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ static int brcm_nvram_parse(struct brcm_
+ len = le32_to_cpu(header.len);
+
+ data = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
++ if (!data)
++ return -ENOMEM;
++
+ memcpy_fromio(data, priv->base, len);
+ data[len - 1] = '\0';
+
--- /dev/null
+From c151d5ed8e8fe0474bd61dce7f2076ca5916c683 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
+Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:40:07 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: sunxi_sid: Always use 32-bit MMIO reads
+
+The SID SRAM on at least some SoCs (A64 and D1) returns different values
+when read with bus cycles narrower than 32 bits. This is not immediately
+obvious, because memcpy_fromio() uses word-size accesses as long as
+enough data is being copied.
+
+The vendor driver always uses 32-bit MMIO reads, so do the same here.
+This is faster than the register-based method, which is currently used
+as a workaround on A64. And it fixes the values returned on D1, where
+the SRAM method was being used.
+
+The special case for the last word is needed to maintain .word_size == 1
+for sysfs ABI compatibility, as noted previously in commit de2a3eaea552
+("nvmem: sunxi_sid: Optimize register read-out method").
+
+Fixes: 07ae4fde9efa ("nvmem: sunxi_sid: Add support for D1 variant")
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
+Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
+Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127104015.23839-3-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
++++ b/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
+@@ -41,8 +41,21 @@ static int sunxi_sid_read(void *context,
+ void *val, size_t bytes)
+ {
+ struct sunxi_sid *sid = context;
++ u32 word;
+
+- memcpy_fromio(val, sid->base + sid->value_offset + offset, bytes);
++ /* .stride = 4 so offset is guaranteed to be aligned */
++ __ioread32_copy(val, sid->base + sid->value_offset + offset, bytes / 4);
++
++ val += round_down(bytes, 4);
++ offset += round_down(bytes, 4);
++ bytes = bytes % 4;
++
++ if (!bytes)
++ return 0;
++
++ /* Handle any trailing bytes */
++ word = readl_relaxed(sid->base + sid->value_offset + offset);
++ memcpy(val, &word, bytes);
+
+ return 0;
+ }
--- /dev/null
+From edcf2fb660526b5ed29f93bd17328a2b4835c8b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
+Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:40:12 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: core: fix device node refcounting
+
+In of_nvmem_cell_get(), of_get_next_parent() is used on cell_np. This
+will decrement the refcount on cell_np, but cell_np is still used later
+in the code. Use of_get_parent() instead and of_node_put() in the
+appropriate places.
+
+Fixes: 69aba7948cbe ("nvmem: Add a simple NVMEM framework for consumers")
+Fixes: 7ae6478b304b ("nvmem: core: rework nvmem cell instance creation")
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
+Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127104015.23839-8-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/nvmem/core.c | 11 ++++++++---
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
++++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+@@ -1242,16 +1242,21 @@ struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(str
+ if (!cell_np)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
+- nvmem_np = of_get_next_parent(cell_np);
+- if (!nvmem_np)
++ nvmem_np = of_get_parent(cell_np);
++ if (!nvmem_np) {
++ of_node_put(cell_np);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
++ }
+
+ nvmem = __nvmem_device_get(nvmem_np, device_match_of_node);
+ of_node_put(nvmem_np);
+- if (IS_ERR(nvmem))
++ if (IS_ERR(nvmem)) {
++ of_node_put(cell_np);
+ return ERR_CAST(nvmem);
++ }
+
+ cell_entry = nvmem_find_cell_entry_by_node(nvmem, cell_np);
++ of_node_put(cell_np);
+ if (!cell_entry) {
+ __nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+ if (cell_spec.args_count)
+ cell_index = cell_spec.args[0];
- nvmem_np = of_get_next_parent(cell_np);
- if (!nvmem_np)
-@@ -1257,7 +1272,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(str
+ nvmem_np = of_get_parent(cell_np);
+ if (!nvmem_np) {
+@@ -1262,7 +1277,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(str
return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
}
if (IS_ERR(cell))
__nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
-@@ -1410,8 +1425,8 @@ static void nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_p
+@@ -1415,8 +1430,8 @@ static void nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_p
}
static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
{
int rc;
-@@ -1425,7 +1440,7 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvme
+@@ -1430,7 +1445,7 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvme
nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf);
if (nvmem->cell_post_process) {
cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
if (rc)
return rc;
-@@ -1460,7 +1475,7 @@ void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell
+@@ -1465,7 +1480,7 @@ void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell
if (!buf)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
if (rc) {
kfree(buf);
return ERR_PTR(rc);
-@@ -1773,7 +1788,7 @@ ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nv
+@@ -1778,7 +1793,7 @@ ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nv
if (rc)
return rc;
--- /dev/null
+From b0576ade3aaf24b376ea1a4406ae138e2a22b0c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
+Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:40:06 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: brcm_nvram: Add check for kzalloc
+
+Add the check for the return value of kzalloc in order to avoid
+NULL pointer dereference.
+
+Fixes: 6e977eaa8280 ("nvmem: brcm_nvram: parse NVRAM content into NVMEM cells")
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
+Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127104015.23839-2-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/nvmem/brcm_nvram.c | 3 +++
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/nvmem/brcm_nvram.c
++++ b/drivers/nvmem/brcm_nvram.c
+@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ static int brcm_nvram_parse(struct brcm_
+ len = le32_to_cpu(header.len);
+
+ data = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
++ if (!data)
++ return -ENOMEM;
++
+ memcpy_fromio(data, priv->base, len);
+ data[len - 1] = '\0';
+
--- /dev/null
+From c151d5ed8e8fe0474bd61dce7f2076ca5916c683 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
+Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:40:07 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: sunxi_sid: Always use 32-bit MMIO reads
+
+The SID SRAM on at least some SoCs (A64 and D1) returns different values
+when read with bus cycles narrower than 32 bits. This is not immediately
+obvious, because memcpy_fromio() uses word-size accesses as long as
+enough data is being copied.
+
+The vendor driver always uses 32-bit MMIO reads, so do the same here.
+This is faster than the register-based method, which is currently used
+as a workaround on A64. And it fixes the values returned on D1, where
+the SRAM method was being used.
+
+The special case for the last word is needed to maintain .word_size == 1
+for sysfs ABI compatibility, as noted previously in commit de2a3eaea552
+("nvmem: sunxi_sid: Optimize register read-out method").
+
+Fixes: 07ae4fde9efa ("nvmem: sunxi_sid: Add support for D1 variant")
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
+Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
+Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127104015.23839-3-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
++++ b/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c
+@@ -41,8 +41,21 @@ static int sunxi_sid_read(void *context,
+ void *val, size_t bytes)
+ {
+ struct sunxi_sid *sid = context;
++ u32 word;
+
+- memcpy_fromio(val, sid->base + sid->value_offset + offset, bytes);
++ /* .stride = 4 so offset is guaranteed to be aligned */
++ __ioread32_copy(val, sid->base + sid->value_offset + offset, bytes / 4);
++
++ val += round_down(bytes, 4);
++ offset += round_down(bytes, 4);
++ bytes = bytes % 4;
++
++ if (!bytes)
++ return 0;
++
++ /* Handle any trailing bytes */
++ word = readl_relaxed(sid->base + sid->value_offset + offset);
++ memcpy(val, &word, bytes);
+
+ return 0;
+ }
--- /dev/null
+From edcf2fb660526b5ed29f93bd17328a2b4835c8b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
+Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:40:12 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] nvmem: core: fix device node refcounting
+
+In of_nvmem_cell_get(), of_get_next_parent() is used on cell_np. This
+will decrement the refcount on cell_np, but cell_np is still used later
+in the code. Use of_get_parent() instead and of_node_put() in the
+appropriate places.
+
+Fixes: 69aba7948cbe ("nvmem: Add a simple NVMEM framework for consumers")
+Fixes: 7ae6478b304b ("nvmem: core: rework nvmem cell instance creation")
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
+Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
+Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
+Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127104015.23839-8-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ drivers/nvmem/core.c | 11 ++++++++---
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
++++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
+@@ -1240,16 +1240,21 @@ struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(str
+ if (!cell_np)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
+- nvmem_np = of_get_next_parent(cell_np);
+- if (!nvmem_np)
++ nvmem_np = of_get_parent(cell_np);
++ if (!nvmem_np) {
++ of_node_put(cell_np);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
++ }
+
+ nvmem = __nvmem_device_get(nvmem_np, device_match_of_node);
+ of_node_put(nvmem_np);
+- if (IS_ERR(nvmem))
++ if (IS_ERR(nvmem)) {
++ of_node_put(cell_np);
+ return ERR_CAST(nvmem);
++ }
+
+ cell_entry = nvmem_find_cell_entry_by_node(nvmem, cell_np);
++ of_node_put(cell_np);
+ if (!cell_entry) {
+ __nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+ if (cell_spec.args_count)
+ cell_index = cell_spec.args[0];
- nvmem_np = of_get_next_parent(cell_np);
- if (!nvmem_np)
-@@ -1255,7 +1270,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(str
+ nvmem_np = of_get_parent(cell_np);
+ if (!nvmem_np) {
+@@ -1260,7 +1275,7 @@ struct nvmem_cell *of_nvmem_cell_get(str
return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
}
if (IS_ERR(cell))
__nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
-@@ -1408,8 +1423,8 @@ static void nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_p
+@@ -1413,8 +1428,8 @@ static void nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_p
}
static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
{
int rc;
-@@ -1423,7 +1438,7 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvme
+@@ -1428,7 +1443,7 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvme
nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf);
if (nvmem->cell_post_process) {
cell->offset, buf, cell->bytes);
if (rc)
return rc;
-@@ -1458,7 +1473,7 @@ void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell
+@@ -1463,7 +1478,7 @@ void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell
if (!buf)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
if (rc) {
kfree(buf);
return ERR_PTR(rc);
-@@ -1771,7 +1786,7 @@ ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nv
+@@ -1776,7 +1791,7 @@ ssize_t nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nv
if (rc)
return rc;