To avoid regressions such as the one fixed by
4a35a9027f64 ("Revert
"perf pmu: Fix pmu events parsing rule""), where '-e intel_pt//u' got
broken, with this new entry in this 'perf tests' subtest, we would have
caught it before pushing upstream.
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kw62fys9bwdgsp722so2ln1l@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
return 0;
}
+static int test__intel_pt(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
+{
+ struct perf_evsel *evsel = perf_evlist__first(evlist);
+
+ TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong name setting", strcmp(evsel->name, "intel_pt//u") == 0);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int count_tracepoints(void)
{
struct dirent *events_ent;
.check = test__checkevent_config_cache,
.id = 51,
},
+ {
+ .name = "intel_pt//u",
+ .check = test__intel_pt,
+ .id = 52,
+ },
};
static struct evlist_test test__events_pmu[] = {