#define _ASM_RISCV_IO_H
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <asm/mmiowb.h>
extern void __iomem *ioremap(phys_addr_t offset, unsigned long size);
}
#endif
-/*
- * FIXME: I'm flip-flopping on whether or not we should keep this or enforce
- * the ordering with I/O on spinlocks like PowerPC does. The worry is that
- * drivers won't get this correct, but I also don't want to introduce a fence
- * into the lock code that otherwise only uses AMOs (and is essentially defined
- * by the ISA to be correct). For now I'm leaving this here: "o,w" is
- * sufficient to ensure that all writes to the device have completed before the
- * write to the spinlock is allowed to commit. I surmised this from reading
- * "ACQUIRES VS I/O ACCESSES" in memory-barriers.txt.
- */
-#define mmiowb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence o,w" : : : "memory");
-
/*
* Unordered I/O memory access primitives. These are even more relaxed than
* the relaxed versions, as they don't even order accesses between successive
#define __io_br() do {} while (0)
#define __io_ar(v) __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence i,r" : : : "memory");
#define __io_bw() __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence w,o" : : : "memory");
-#define __io_aw() do {} while (0)
+#define __io_aw() mmiowb_set_pending()
#define readb(c) ({ u8 __v; __io_br(); __v = readb_cpu(c); __io_ar(__v); __v; })
#define readw(c) ({ u16 __v; __io_br(); __v = readw_cpu(c); __io_ar(__v); __v; })
--- /dev/null
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+
+#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_MMIOWB_H
+#define _ASM_RISCV_MMIOWB_H
+
+/*
+ * "o,w" is sufficient to ensure that all writes to the device have completed
+ * before the write to the spinlock is allowed to commit.
+ */
+#define mmiowb() __asm__ __volatile__ ("fence o,w" : : : "memory");
+
+#include <asm-generic/mmiowb.h>
+
+#endif /* ASM_RISCV_MMIOWB_H */