!!'s behaviour isn't that obvious and sparse complained about it, so
let's replace it with a ternary condition.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
return -EINVAL;
}
- *val = !!(*val) * 700000;
+ *val = *val ? 700000 : 0;
return IIO_VAL_INT;
}
if (val != 0 && val != 700000)
return -EINVAL;
+ val = val ? 1 : 0;
+
switch (chan->channel) {
case AXP20X_GPIO0_V:
reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0;
- regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(!!val);
+ regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO0_VAL(val);
break;
case AXP20X_GPIO1_V:
reg = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1;
- regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(!!val);
+ regval = AXP20X_GPIO10_IN_RANGE_GPIO1_VAL(val);
break;
default: