ARM: dts: exynos: Fix port nodes names for Exynos5420 Peach Pit board
authorJavier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Mon, 6 Jun 2016 20:24:44 +0000 (16:24 -0400)
committerKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:00:39 +0000 (11:00 +0200)
Commit bea7eef6949c ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix DTC unit name warnings in
Peach Pit") fixed the DTC warnings about mismatches between unit names
and reg properties in the Exynos5420 Peach Pit DTS.

But unfortunately it also added a regression on the Peach Pit when
changing the port node names since the OF graph logic expects the port
nodes to be always named 'port'.

The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt binding document says
that when there is more than one port, '#address-cells', '#size-cells'
and 'reg' properties should be used to number the port nodes.

Fixes: bea7eef6949c ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix DTC unit name warnings in Peach Pit")
Reported-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts

index f9d2e4f1a0e09598de0ad852bec24996b7373c56..1de972d46a87f31abc814991b2517d4bf75a59f1 100644 (file)
        hpd-gpios = <&gpx2 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
 
        ports {
-               port0 {
+               port {
                        dp_out: endpoint {
                                remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in>;
                        };
                use-external-pwm;
 
                ports {
-                       port0 {
+                       #address-cells = <1>;
+                       #size-cells = <0>;
+
+                       port@0 {
+                               reg = <0>;
+
                                bridge_out: endpoint {
                                        remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
                                };
                        };
 
-                       port1 {
+                       port@1 {
+                               reg = <1>;
+
                                bridge_in: endpoint {
                                        remote-endpoint = <&dp_out>;
                                };