Btrfs: cleanup: use consistent lock naming
authorDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:59:29 +0000 (09:59 +0300)
committerJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Fri, 11 May 2012 14:56:41 +0000 (10:56 -0400)
It confuses Smatch that we use two names for the same lock.  Plus the
shorter name is nicer.  This doesn't change how the code works, it's
just a cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c

index 49fd7b66d57b272c7aeaea7db4b1bbd0985f8aa2..59ae191d4f93f515ad2a4a661a56313a028fbf0f 100644 (file)
@@ -3578,7 +3578,7 @@ again:
        space_info->chunk_alloc = 0;
        spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
 out:
-       mutex_unlock(&extent_root->fs_info->chunk_mutex);
+       mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
        return ret;
 }