--- /dev/null
+From fe76f487e28bdc61940f304f153a954cf36935ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
+Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 01:55:32 +0300
+Subject: [PATCH 1/3] EAP-pwd server: Fix reassembly buffer handling
+
+data->inbuf allocation might fail and if that were to happen, the next
+fragment in the exchange could have resulted in NULL pointer
+dereference. Unexpected fragment with more bit might also be able to
+trigger this. Fix that by explicitly checking for data->inbuf to be
+available before using it.
+
+Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
+---
+ src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c | 8 +++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c
++++ b/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c
+@@ -947,6 +947,12 @@ static void eap_pwd_process(struct eap_s
+ * the first and all intermediate fragments have the M bit set
+ */
+ if (EAP_PWD_GET_MORE_BIT(lm_exch) || data->in_frag_pos) {
++ if (!data->inbuf) {
++ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG,
++ "EAP-pwd: No buffer for reassembly");
++ eap_pwd_state(data, FAILURE);
++ return;
++ }
+ if ((data->in_frag_pos + len) > wpabuf_size(data->inbuf)) {
+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Buffer overflow "
+ "attack detected! (%d+%d > %d)",
+@@ -967,7 +973,7 @@ static void eap_pwd_process(struct eap_s
+ * last fragment won't have the M bit set (but we're obviously
+ * buffering fragments so that's how we know it's the last)
+ */
+- if (data->in_frag_pos) {
++ if (data->in_frag_pos && data->inbuf) {
+ pos = wpabuf_head_u8(data->inbuf);
+ len = data->in_frag_pos;
+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Last fragment, %d bytes",
--- /dev/null
+From d2d1a324ce937628e4d9d9999fe113819b7d4478 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
+Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 02:21:20 +0300
+Subject: [PATCH 3/3] EAP-pwd peer: Fix reassembly buffer handling
+
+Unexpected fragment might result in data->inbuf not being allocated
+before processing and that could have resulted in NULL pointer
+dereference. Fix that by explicitly checking for data->inbuf to be
+available before using it.
+
+Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
+---
+ src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c | 9 ++++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c
++++ b/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c
+@@ -969,6 +969,13 @@ eap_pwd_process(struct eap_sm *sm, void
+ * buffer and ACK the fragment
+ */
+ if (EAP_PWD_GET_MORE_BIT(lm_exch) || data->in_frag_pos) {
++ if (!data->inbuf) {
++ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG,
++ "EAP-pwd: No buffer for reassembly");
++ ret->methodState = METHOD_DONE;
++ ret->decision = DECISION_FAIL;
++ return NULL;
++ }
+ data->in_frag_pos += len;
+ if (data->in_frag_pos > wpabuf_size(data->inbuf)) {
+ wpa_printf(MSG_INFO, "EAP-pwd: Buffer overflow attack "
+@@ -995,7 +1002,7 @@ eap_pwd_process(struct eap_sm *sm, void
+ /*
+ * we're buffering and this is the last fragment
+ */
+- if (data->in_frag_pos) {
++ if (data->in_frag_pos && data->inbuf) {
+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Last fragment, %d bytes",
+ (int) len);
+ pos = wpabuf_head_u8(data->inbuf);