bnx2x: Self-test false positive
authorYitchak Gertner <gertner@broadcom.com>
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:51:28 +0000 (15:51 -0700)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:02:35 +0000 (16:02 -0700)
Self-test false positive
- The memory test should use a mask according to the chip type
- In the register test, check the port only once and not inside the for
  loop (not causing a failure - just ugly)

Signed-off-by: Yitchak Gertner <gertner@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/net/bnx2x_main.c

index b8cdce21c5d9030e4b90046ea01d7ed2bc5043a7..a4177e964c56f5f14603c8c58372051643244882 100644 (file)
@@ -8420,6 +8420,7 @@ static int bnx2x_test_registers(struct bnx2x *bp)
 {
        int idx, i, rc = -ENODEV;
        u32 wr_val = 0;
+       int port = BP_PORT(bp);
        static const struct {
                u32  offset0;
                u32  offset1;
@@ -8485,7 +8486,6 @@ static int bnx2x_test_registers(struct bnx2x *bp)
 
                for (i = 0; reg_tbl[i].offset0 != 0xffffffff; i++) {
                        u32 offset, mask, save_val, val;
-                       int port = BP_PORT(bp);
 
                        offset = reg_tbl[i].offset0 + port*reg_tbl[i].offset1;
                        mask = reg_tbl[i].mask;
@@ -8531,16 +8531,17 @@ static int bnx2x_test_memory(struct bnx2x *bp)
        static const struct {
                char *name;
                u32 offset;
-               u32 mask;
+               u32 e1_mask;
+               u32 e1h_mask;
        } prty_tbl[] = {
-               { "CCM_REG_CCM_PRTY_STS",     CCM_REG_CCM_PRTY_STS,     0 },
-               { "CFC_REG_CFC_PRTY_STS",     CFC_REG_CFC_PRTY_STS,     0 },
-               { "DMAE_REG_DMAE_PRTY_STS",   DMAE_REG_DMAE_PRTY_STS,   0 },
-               { "TCM_REG_TCM_PRTY_STS",     TCM_REG_TCM_PRTY_STS,     0 },
-               { "UCM_REG_UCM_PRTY_STS",     UCM_REG_UCM_PRTY_STS,     0 },
-               { "XCM_REG_XCM_PRTY_STS",     XCM_REG_XCM_PRTY_STS,     0x1 },
-
-               { NULL, 0xffffffff, 0 }
+               { "CCM_PRTY_STS",  CCM_REG_CCM_PRTY_STS,   0x3ffc0, 0 },
+               { "CFC_PRTY_STS",  CFC_REG_CFC_PRTY_STS,   0x2,     0x2 },
+               { "DMAE_PRTY_STS", DMAE_REG_DMAE_PRTY_STS, 0,       0 },
+               { "TCM_PRTY_STS",  TCM_REG_TCM_PRTY_STS,   0x3ffc0, 0 },
+               { "UCM_PRTY_STS",  UCM_REG_UCM_PRTY_STS,   0x3ffc0, 0 },
+               { "XCM_PRTY_STS",  XCM_REG_XCM_PRTY_STS,   0x3ffc1, 0 },
+
+               { NULL, 0xffffffff, 0, 0 }
        };
 
        if (!netif_running(bp->dev))
@@ -8554,7 +8555,8 @@ static int bnx2x_test_memory(struct bnx2x *bp)
        /* Check the parity status */
        for (i = 0; prty_tbl[i].offset != 0xffffffff; i++) {
                val = REG_RD(bp, prty_tbl[i].offset);
-               if (val & ~(prty_tbl[i].mask)) {
+               if ((CHIP_IS_E1(bp) && (val & ~(prty_tbl[i].e1_mask))) ||
+                   (CHIP_IS_E1H(bp) && (val & ~(prty_tbl[i].e1h_mask)))) {
                        DP(NETIF_MSG_HW,
                           "%s is 0x%x\n", prty_tbl[i].name, val);
                        goto test_mem_exit;