Although well-intentioned, keeping the KF() definition as a hint for
handling scattered CPUID features may be counter-productive. Simply
redefining the bit position only works for directly manipulating the
guest's CPUID leafs, e.g. it doesn't make guest_cpuid_has() magically
work. Taking an alternative approach, e.g. ensuring the bit position
is identical between the Linux-defined and hardware-defined features,
may be a simpler and/or more effective method of exposing scattered
features to the guest.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
#define F(x) bit(X86_FEATURE_##x)
-/* For scattered features from cpufeatures.h; we currently expose none */
-#define KF(x) bit(KVM_CPUID_BIT_##x)
-
int kvm_update_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best;