activate_mm() is not the right thing to be using in use_mm(). It should be
switch_mm().
On normal x86, they're synonymous, but for the Xen patches I'm adding a
hook which assumes that activate_mm is only used the first time a new mm
is used after creation (I have another hook for dealing with dup_mm). I
think this use of activate_mm() is the only place where it could be used
a second time on an mm.
>From a quick look at the other architectures I think this is OK (most
simply implement one in terms of the other), but some are doing some
subtly different stuff between the two.
Acked-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* Note that on UML this *requires* PF_BORROWED_MM to be set, otherwise
* it won't work. Update it accordingly if you change it here
*/
- activate_mm(active_mm, mm);
+ switch_mm(active_mm, mm, tsk);
task_unlock(tsk);
mmdrop(active_mm);