DP nodes live under the soc node, and since soc is a simple bus it requires
node adresses to be present.
So, simply add the node addreses to avoid the following dtc warning:
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/dp1: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/dp2: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/dp3: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/dp4: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/dp5: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/dp6: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/dp5-syn: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /soc/dp6-syn: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
status = "disabled";
};
- dp1: dp1 {
+ dp1: dp1@3a001000 {
device_type = "network";
compatible = "qcom,nss-dp";
qcom,id = <1>;
status = "disabled";
};
- dp2: dp2 {
+ dp2: dp2@3a001200 {
device_type = "network";
compatible = "qcom,nss-dp";
qcom,id = <2>;
status = "disabled";
};
- dp3: dp3 {
+ dp3: dp3@3a001400 {
device_type = "network";
compatible = "qcom,nss-dp";
qcom,id = <3>;
status = "disabled";
};
- dp4: dp4 {
+ dp4: dp4@3a001600 {
device_type = "network";
compatible = "qcom,nss-dp";
qcom,id = <4>;
status = "disabled";
};
- dp5: dp5 {
+ dp5: dp5@3a001800 {
device_type = "network";
compatible = "qcom,nss-dp";
qcom,id = <5>;
status = "disabled";
};
- dp6: dp6 {
+ dp6: dp6@3a001a00 {
device_type = "network";
compatible = "qcom,nss-dp";
qcom,id = <6>;
status = "disabled";
};
- dp5_syn: dp5-syn {
+ dp5_syn: dp5-syn@3a003000 {
device_type = "network";
compatible = "qcom,nss-dp";
qcom,id = <5>;
status = "disabled";
};
- dp6_syn: dp6-syn {
+ dp6_syn: dp6-syn@3a007000 {
device_type = "network";
compatible = "qcom,nss-dp";
qcom,id = <6>;