As measured in my prior patch ("sch_netem: faster rb tree removal"),
rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe() is nice looking but much slower
than using rb_next() directly, except when tree is small enough
to fit in CPU caches (then the cost is the same)
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
void inetpeer_invalidate_tree(struct inet_peer_base *base)
{
- struct inet_peer *p, *n;
+ struct rb_node *p = rb_first(&base->rb_root);
- rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &base->rb_root, rb_node) {
- inet_putpeer(p);
+ while (p) {
+ struct inet_peer *peer = rb_entry(p, struct inet_peer, rb_node);
+
+ p = rb_next(p);
+ rb_erase(&peer->rb_node, &base->rb_root);
+ inet_putpeer(peer);
cond_resched();
}
- base->rb_root = RB_ROOT;
base->total = 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(inetpeer_invalidate_tree);