There is a call to write_lock() in gen_pool_destroy which is not balanced
by any corresponding write_unlock(). This causes problems with preemption
because the preemption-disable counter is incremented in the write_lock()
call, but never decremented by any call to write_unlock(). This bug is
gen_pool_destroy, and one of them is non-x86 arch-specific code.
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <zygo.blaxell@xandros.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>
Cc: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
int bit, end_bit;
- write_lock(&pool->lock);
list_for_each_safe(_chunk, _next_chunk, &pool->chunks) {
chunk = list_entry(_chunk, struct gen_pool_chunk, next_chunk);
list_del(&chunk->next_chunk);