No local_bh_disable is needed there once we run everything in process
context. The same goes for the replacement of bh_lock_sock() by
lock_sock().
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
BT_DBG("parent %p", parent);
- local_bh_disable();
list_for_each_safe(p, n, &bt_sk(parent)->accept_q) {
sk = (struct sock *) list_entry(p, struct bt_sock, accept_q);
- bh_lock_sock(sk);
+ lock_sock(sk);
/* FIXME: Is this check still needed */
if (sk->sk_state == BT_CLOSED) {
- bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+ release_sock(sk);
bt_accept_unlink(sk);
continue;
}
if (newsock)
sock_graft(sk, newsock);
- bh_unlock_sock(sk);
- local_bh_enable();
+ release_sock(sk);
return sk;
}
- bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+ release_sock(sk);
}
- local_bh_enable();
return NULL;
}