In DTS Checklist[1] we're now demanding proper generic node names, as
the name of a node should reflect the function of the device and use
generic name for that[2]. Everybody seems to be copy&pasting from DTS
files available in the repository today, so let's unify that naming
there as well and provide proper examples.
1. https://openwrt.org/submitting-patches#dts_checklist
2. https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/blob/master/source/devicetree-basics.rst#generic-names-recommendation
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
[split up, removed entries where it could clash due to ath9k-leds]
Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
clock-frequency = <40000000>;
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
rf: rf_green {
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power: power {
label = "netgear:green:power";
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
led_system: system {
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
system: system {
};
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&switch_led_pins>;
compatible = "ubnt,nanostation-ac","ubnt,wa", "qca,ar9342";
model = "Ubiquiti Nanostation AC (WA)";
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
rssi0 {
led-failsafe = &system;
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
link1 {
bootargs = "console=ttyS0,115200n8";
};
- gpio-leds {
+ leds {
compatible = "gpio-leds";
power: power {