#define DPLL_MIN_DIVIDER 1
/* Possible error results from _dpll_test_mult */
-#define DPLL_MULT_UNDERFLOW (1 << 0)
+#define DPLL_MULT_UNDERFLOW -1
/*
* Scale factor to mitigate roundoff errors in DPLL rate rounding.
unsigned long target_rate,
unsigned long parent_rate)
{
- int flags = 0, carry = 0;
+ int r = 0, carry = 0;
/* Unscale m and round if necessary */
if (*m % DPLL_SCALE_FACTOR >= DPLL_ROUNDING_VAL)
if (*m < DPLL_MIN_MULTIPLIER) {
*m = DPLL_MIN_MULTIPLIER;
*new_rate = 0;
- flags = DPLL_MULT_UNDERFLOW;
+ r = DPLL_MULT_UNDERFLOW;
}
if (*new_rate == 0)
*new_rate = _dpll_compute_new_rate(parent_rate, *m, n);
- return flags;
+ return r;
}
/**
dd->last_rounded_rate = 0;
- for (n = dd->max_divider; n >= DPLL_MIN_DIVIDER; n--) {
+ for (n = DPLL_MIN_DIVIDER; n <= dd->max_divider; n++) {
/* Compute the scaled DPLL multiplier, based on the divider */
m = scaled_rt_rp * n;
/*
- * Since we're counting n down, a m overflow means we can
- * can immediately skip to the next n
+ * Since we're counting n up, a m overflow means we
+ * can bail out completely (since as n increases in
+ * the next iteration, there's no way that m can
+ * increase beyond the current m)
*/
if (m > scaled_max_m)
- continue;
+ break;
r = _dpll_test_mult(&m, n, &new_rate, target_rate,
clk->parent->rate);
+ /* m can't be set low enough for this n - try with a larger n */
+ if (r == DPLL_MULT_UNDERFLOW)
+ continue;
+
e = target_rate - new_rate;
pr_debug("clock: n = %d: m = %d: rate error is %d "
"(new_rate = %ld)\n", n, m, e, new_rate);
min_e_n = n;
pr_debug("clock: found new least error %d\n", min_e);
- }
- /*
- * Since we're counting n down, a m underflow means we
- * can bail out completely (since as n decreases in
- * the next iteration, there's no way that m can
- * increase beyond the current m)
- */
- if (r & DPLL_MULT_UNDERFLOW)
- break;
+ /* We found good settings -- bail out now */
+ if (min_e <= clk->dpll_data->rate_tolerance)
+ break;
+ }
}
if (min_e < 0) {