ACPI / button: Delay acpi_lid_initialize_state() until first user space open
authorHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:07:06 +0000 (16:07 +0200)
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:30:44 +0000 (00:30 +0100)
ACPI _LID methods may depend on OpRegions and do not always handle
handlers for those OpRegions not being present properly e.g. :

            Method (_LID, 0, NotSerialized)  // _LID: Lid Status
            {
                If ((^^I2C5.PMI1.AVBL == One) && (^^GPO2.AVBL == One))
                {
                    Return (^^GPO2.LPOL) /* \_SB_.GPO2.LPOL */
                }
            }

Note the missing Return (1) when either of the OpRegions is not available,
this causes (in this case) a report of the lid-switch being closed,
which causes userspace to do an immediate suspend at boot.

This commit delays getting the initial state and thus calling _LID for
the first time until userspace opens the /dev/input/event# node. This
ensures that all drivers will have had a chance to load and registerer
their OpRegions before the first _LID call, fixing this issue.

Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
drivers/acpi/button.c

index ef1856b15488be10cf81f8abfa20c630f461768d..c391898b483c84067aadc35f8f36fd932d674fb9 100644 (file)
@@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ static void acpi_button_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
 {
        struct acpi_button *button = acpi_driver_data(device);
        struct input_dev *input;
+       int users;
 
        switch (event) {
        case ACPI_FIXED_HARDWARE_EVENT:
@@ -398,7 +399,11 @@ static void acpi_button_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
        case ACPI_BUTTON_NOTIFY_STATUS:
                input = button->input;
                if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID) {
-                       acpi_lid_update_state(device);
+                       mutex_lock(&button->input->mutex);
+                       users = button->input->users;
+                       mutex_unlock(&button->input->mutex);
+                       if (users)
+                               acpi_lid_update_state(device);
                } else {
                        int keycode;
 
@@ -442,12 +447,24 @@ static int acpi_button_resume(struct device *dev)
        struct acpi_button *button = acpi_driver_data(device);
 
        button->suspended = false;
-       if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID)
+       if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID && button->input->users)
                acpi_lid_initialize_state(device);
        return 0;
 }
 #endif
 
+static int acpi_lid_input_open(struct input_dev *input)
+{
+       struct acpi_device *device = input_get_drvdata(input);
+       struct acpi_button *button = acpi_driver_data(device);
+
+       button->last_state = !!acpi_lid_evaluate_state(device);
+       button->last_time = ktime_get();
+       acpi_lid_initialize_state(device);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
 static int acpi_button_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
        struct acpi_button *button;
@@ -488,8 +505,7 @@ static int acpi_button_add(struct acpi_device *device)
                strcpy(name, ACPI_BUTTON_DEVICE_NAME_LID);
                sprintf(class, "%s/%s",
                        ACPI_BUTTON_CLASS, ACPI_BUTTON_SUBCLASS_LID);
-               button->last_state = !!acpi_lid_evaluate_state(device);
-               button->last_time = ktime_get();
+               input->open = acpi_lid_input_open;
        } else {
                printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Unsupported hid [%s]\n", hid);
                error = -ENODEV;
@@ -522,11 +538,11 @@ static int acpi_button_add(struct acpi_device *device)
                break;
        }
 
+       input_set_drvdata(input, device);
        error = input_register_device(input);
        if (error)
                goto err_remove_fs;
        if (button->type == ACPI_BUTTON_TYPE_LID) {
-               acpi_lid_initialize_state(device);
                /*
                 * This assumes there's only one lid device, or if there are
                 * more we only care about the last one...