Commit
396244692232 ("arm64: preempt: Provide our own implementation of
asm/preempt.h") extended the preempt count field in struct thread_info
to 64 bits, so that it consists of a 32-bit count plus a 32-bit flag
indicating whether or not the current task needs rescheduling.
Whilst the asm-offsets definition of TSK_TI_PREEMPT was updated to point
to this new field, the assembly usage was left untouched meaning that a
32-bit load from TSK_TI_PREEMPT on a big-endian machine actually returns
the reschedule flag instead of the count.
Whilst we could fix this by pointing TSK_TI_PREEMPT at the count field,
we're actually better off reworking the two assembly users so that they
operate on the whole 64-bit value in favour of inspecting the thread
flags separately in order to determine whether a reschedule is needed.
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
.macro if_will_cond_yield_neon
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
get_thread_info x0
- ldr w1, [x0, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT]
- ldr x0, [x0, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]
- cmp w1, #PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET
- csel x0, x0, xzr, eq
- tbnz x0, #TIF_NEED_RESCHED, .Lyield_\@ // needs rescheduling?
+ ldr x0, [x0, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT]
+ sub x0, x0, #PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET
+ cbz x0, .Lyield_\@
/* fall through to endif_yield_neon */
.subsection 1
.Lyield_\@ :
irq_handler
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
- ldr w24, [tsk, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT] // get preempt count
- cbnz w24, 1f // preempt count != 0
- ldr x0, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS] // get flags
- tbz x0, #TIF_NEED_RESCHED, 1f // needs rescheduling?
+ ldr x24, [tsk, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT] // get preempt count
+ cbnz x24, 1f // preempt count != 0
bl el1_preempt
1:
#endif